NH Cops Turn Argument Into Shootout, House Fire

Brentwood, NH Police Officer Steve Arkell Dead After Turning Argument Into Shootout.

Well, that escalated quickly. One police officer, and one “suspect” are dead after what began as a domestic argument Monday in a 55 and older community in Brentwood, NH, ended in a gun fight and exploding home.

86 year old Walter Nolan, lived on Mill Pond road with his son Michael, reports the Boston Herald. They got into some kind of argument, some time around 4:00pm. Rather than ask if everything was okay, a neighbor decided to call the most powerful gang in town, the Brentwood Police. Predictably, this did not improve matters any.

Brentwood, NH Police Officer Steve Arkell Dead After Turning Argument Into Shootout

Brentwood, NH Police Officer Steve Arkell Dead After Turning Argument Into Shootout

Part-time Brentwood police officer Steve Arkell, arrived on the scene shortly after, but apparently Michael Nolan didn’t want his “help”. Arkell, a 48 year old father of two, was shot to death as he entered the home, presumably without invitation. A second officer arrived on the scene, and also entered the home, but fled when he was met with what has been described as “rapid gun fire”.

Police flooded the scene, as an as of yet unknown cause started a fire inside the home, resulting in an explosion. The suspected shooter, is believed to have died in the blaze. His father was taken to the hospital for as of yet unreported injuries.

That’s about the summary of the available facts reported by the media so far, but allow me to speculate.

New Hampshire is a place with little gun control, and as a result, there is very little crime, at least in the private sector. As I read New Hampshire news, it seems like every time I hear about gun violence, the police are involved, and it usually involves them entering a home without the consent of the home owner.

Sponsored in part by Suns of Liberty Mint

Sponsored in part by Suns of Liberty Mint

I don’t know the Nolan family, but according to neighbors, they weren’t dangerous people. Susan Hughes told the Union Leader that Michael Nolan “never really talked to anybody; he stays upstairs with his TV on.” James Culbertson, 73, said the elder Nolan “seemed like a nice guy.” The Union Leader reported that Walter Nolan’s wife died two years ago, and Michael Nolan’s died of cancer in 2008.

So how do these seemingly normal people find themselves in a gun fight and exploding home? Obviously, it’s because the great escalators showed up. Some busybody neighbor hears an “argument” and thinks this is a really great reason to dial 911, knowing that the most violent people around (the police) are going to show up. Said violent people show up, enter the house with a gun, without permission, and surprisingly enough, these folks who didn’t ask for help, aren’t so happy about this.

For whatever reason, maybe he’s irrational because he’s in a heated argument, maybe he genuinely doesn’t know it’s a cop, maybe he’s rightfully fed up with police breaking into homes, the guy in the house opens fire on the cop, killing him. Once this happens, he knows his life is pretty much over. He knows that more police are going to come, and if he’s lucky enough to survive the ride to the jail, he’ll probably never leave. Faced with this horrific scenario, setting his home ablaze and taking his own life starts seeming like a reasonable alternative.

From the Houston Chronicle;

“The entire State of New Hampshire is in mourning over the tragic loss of Brentwood Officer Steve Arkell,” Gov. Maggie Hassan said in a statement. “Officer Arkell bravely answered the call of duty and made the ultimate sacrifice, a heroic demonstration of his commitment to the safety of his fellow citizens.

“Like so many of our first responders do on a daily basis, Officer Arkell courageously put his life on the line to protect others, and in doing so, was tragically taken far too soon,” she said.

As a New Hampshire resident, I couldn’t disagree more. I mourn the loss of Michael Nolan. I mourn the injuries of his father. I’m upset about the property damage. Not the loss of Officer Arkell’s life.

Steve Arkell would be fine if he had taken a job as a construction worker, or a computer technician, or as a fast food cook. Instead, he decided to walk into a stranger’s home with a weapon, and turn a simple argument into a gun fight and exploding home. If Arkell had not shown up, this story would probably not even be worthy of news coverage, just another spat between two widowers in a retirement community.

So the next time you’re thinking of calling 911 because your neighbors raise their voices, ask yourself if it’s worth all the death and destruction that so often follows these marauders around.

UPDATE: This article has really upset a lot of people, I have made a video response addressing their concerns, here.

If you appreciate the work I do, please consider donating, or advertising here.

Subscribe via email and never miss another post!

[mc4wp_form id=”7723″]

  • antonlee

    Well said

  • shane

    to bad some of those shots didn’t reach the neighbor, while the loss of any life is tragic…there must be a message sent that you “CANNOT” go where ever you please or just enter any home you please. Just as we face consequences for certain actions so much they face consequences for certain actions.

  • Kevin LaPage

    At least in this case the cop that escalated the situation won’t be doing that again.

    • Robert

      Darwin Award Nominee

      • pat

        As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

        • ebm120

          “Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause” – Pardon if I cant take the rest of what you said seriously.

        • ebm120

          copy/paste is fun.
          You’re contradicting yourself:

          ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

          vs:

          ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

          …and:

          ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

          Vs:

          “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

          SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

          Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

          ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

          OK, listen up, liberal:

          The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

          “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

          (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

          And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

          After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

          Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

          i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
          I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

          And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

          So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

          From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

          The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

          Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

          Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

          “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

          Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

          Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

        • Chuck

          Hey, I am going to assume you attended government schools and don’t know any better, but I have to point out to you that rights don’t come from government. They are natural rights that every man (and woman) on earth is born with. It follows from this that just because you wear a costume, you are not entitled to violate another person’s natural rights. You must obtain permission to access the property that an individual owns. In his defense the law enforcement officer was also probably educated in government schools and was not aware of his violation of the owner’s property rights. In this case his lack of education cost him his life. But you, you can learn something here that could one day save your life. It is your choice, no one is forcing you to accept the truth and use it for your benefit.

    • David Triana

      He will be replaced in less than a day. They “respawn” that fast. So many people looking for a “secure” job within our lord and savior .gov.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just case. meaning safety concern for the others. and if they do it is not a select few that are doing it against others rights. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (86 yr old) was already taken out of the home. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into. there was a general concern for someone else. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son, then he kills himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of anyone (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of another! that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have maybe someone. like I bet you have a kid here or their that you barely see. some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regards for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre not angry at government youre angry at yourself. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • Armed Antagonist

        You sound really fucking stupid.

      • ebm120

        copy-paste is fun
        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

        Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

        i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
        I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

        And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

        So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

        Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

    • Proud Fireman

      http://www.wmur.com/news/brentwood-911-caller-says-she-would-make-call-again/26019528 – this police officer (he died, show some respect) did not “escalate” any situation within his control.

  • TheVala

    Police need to understand that unless there is an immediate crime occurring in view (child being viciously beaten, kidnap victim tied up, blood on the walls, etc), they need to stay out of and respect peoples’ homes. This lady on my street calls the cops whenever a dog is out, a noise is made past 12, or if she just plain doesn’t like what she is viewing outside her window. She’s the kind of person who would call an officer to their death.

    • Efesgirl

      That woman is a nuisance caller.Look into the laws of your state and see if there is something to be done about her. She is abusing the system and, you are right, could one day be the cause of a fatality.

    • Robert

      We used to have a neighbor like that when I was young. She even called the cops on us for simply playing in our front yard.

    • Common Sense

      First: Maybe if you took responsibility for your dogs and not allow them to go into other peoples property and destroy it, there wouldn’t be a problem. The biggest problem with pet owners is not taking responsibility for them especially the dangerous ones. Every week you hear about people getting attacked by neighbors dogs that is why we have leach laws. Obey them and it would not be a problem. Second: Cities have noise ordinances that forbid loud music at all hours of the day especially at night when people are trying to get some sleep to go to work the next day. They call the cops because if they go to your house to ask politely you might be the one shooting them like it has happened before.

      • Yolanda Lyons

        That is why no one should post their home addresses/towns on social media – someone’s stupid post could get them killed. No one said anything at all about property being destroyed or loud music being played.

        • Common Sense

          My post is based on personal experience with neighbors dogs and loud music in the neighborhood and no one taking responsibility for their actions. Always want to blame some else for their problems.

          • Robo

            Get some dual pane windows.

          • JohnBobbitt

            ill shit on your fuckin doorstep

          • freedom74

            You moved into an area where you don’t have several private acres.

            The one to blame for that situation is yourself.

            Grow up and have tolerance for other people that you chose to live shoved up against in a city setting, or, ya know, continue being a grown up child and telling everyone ELSE that THEY are the problem.

          • TheVala

            I feel you on the lack of responsibility. My life revolves around respect to a Japanese level, and my neighbors annoy the hell out of me with their loud music, parties, dogs, and using the street as a private parking lot, smashing glass in the road, trashing people’s yards. But at the same time, calling the cops every night does NOTHING but get them harassing EVERYONE in the vicinity. I know thinking is extremely difficult for people like you so I’ll make this brief: Hopefully you get the cops called on you as many times as you call the cops on other people.

      • Scott Downey

        Your name is misleading.

      • paendragon

        Where did TheVala say it was their dog, idiot?

      • herrbrewer

        The guy said “a dog is out,” which is one small example he mentioned, and you turn that into dog’s destroying property and attacking people. And then you take “a noise after 12” to must mean loud music. Is Common Sense one of those ironic nicknames like Tiny? Just as there are people who have no consideration for others and play loud music late at night, there are people who have nothing better to do than actively try to ruin people’s days for things that are no harm to them. That lady sounds like one of them.

      • TheVala

        1. My dog has never gotten out, chased, or shat in another person’s yard, my neighbors’ dogs do and thats where the cop calling comes from. Your pathetic little point directed at me in a venomous manner is invalid. Poor moron…
        2. I don’t have parties at my house or play music that can be heard outside. Again, your pathetic, angry little point is invalid. Must be feeling stupid now…
        3. Are you the evil lady across the street who constantly calls the cops on my neighbors next to me? That bitter, vile woman who won’t talk to her neighbors but will happily call the police for someone daring to park in the street? Jump off the highest building in your area.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • ebm120

        ctrl+c / ctrl+v
        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

        Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

        i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
        I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

        And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

        So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

        Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

  • a lad

    why cant the police show respect for people by knocking, asking what’s going on instead of just going by what the person on the phone said who isn’t even there, not assume everyone is a scumbag.

    • ThomasThePaine

      Because ALL of therm are Obamaholes. . .

      • Sherri Lucas-Gibson

        Wow, that was an idiotic response.

      • Michael Smith

        You’re a fucking idiot! So then, they’ve all been on the job no more than 6 years? If they have then it has nothing to do with Obama, and it doesn’t. You act as if there’s some kind of difference between Obama and Bush, for example. There isn’t. They’re both part of the one percent, whose only motive is to gain as much power as possible, since that’s what they crave most. The Republican vs. Democrat ruse is, and has been, working perfectly for a long long time now and as long as they keep all of us bickering back and forth about heads or tails, and a bunch of other stupid shit no one cares about, like abortion and immigration, we will remain divided and they can continue to point fingers at each other and continue to take more and more of what we have left away from us. Our rights are gone. The Constitution is a piece of history and the majority of its even most basic tenets are no longer viable in a modern court of law. Even if they find that the cops set the house on fire the only repercussions for the cops will be paid vacations. The FACT that no one on capitol hill is making an issue out of the rising level of violence by LEO’s against American people, or of the system failing to properly come down on judges and prosecutors for doing nothing, is key to understanding what’s really going on. There’s more to problems than heads or tails and everything that sucks isn’t because of “the other side”. It’s because we’re divided and bickering about the wrong shit while they, the one percent, continue to legislate the taking of our hard earned goods for themselves, as well as our ability to do anything about it. But you keep blaming your neighbor while your government sticks it in even deeper. A little lube and a patient approach and you don’t even realize you have the worlds largest cock in your ass, and still want to blame your neighbor for your butt being greasy. Obama and Bush and Clinton and Kerry are all the same wolf who work for exactly the same people.

        • ThomasThePaine

          Nothing in my post implies that Obozo is any different than Bush: You are welcome to substitute with Bushhole. . The only difference between them is that Bush holds hands and kisses King Abdullah and Obozo kneels in front to him!

          We are now in the fourth term of Obushama. I am fully aware that there is no bigger enemy of the American People than Washington DC!
          The only idiot is YOU, for making all those idiotic assumptions from a single line statement.

          May 16, 2014 The American Spring. . . The Tree of Liberty Needs refreshing!
          Bring your own rope. . .

          • zaiger

            then why even bring him up?

          • ThomasThePaine

            I didn’t: Obamahole is simply a spelling of the “other” hole that forum censors don’t delete. . .

        • brian tunk

          ^ I LIKE THIS GUY. WELL SAID

        • ray

          yes there is a different s number 1 Obama is a Muslim trying to take are second amendment bush did not do that Obama and his wife have spent more money on vacations and it has not been eight years yet Obama just ruined freedom of speech with that new law cant even protest anymore if there secret service any were around so yes obama is way way worse then bush so talk about what you know and i can go on and on about Obama

          • Brian Alford

            You know Bush signred your privacy away he gave NSA right to listen to all your phone calls and anything else they want to check out, both sides are full of shit and if you can’t see that you need to take your shit colored glasses off

          • ThomasThePaine

            Bush created the NSA, DHS and the Patriot Act. . . They ALL are enemies of the American people: Bush was just a better liar and actor. . .

            BTW: Allen West, the darling of the Tea party, voted for both the NDAA and HR347. . . Fluke them all!

            May 16 2014 The American Spring. . . The Tree Of Liberty Needs Refreshing!
            Bring your own rope and pitchfork!

          • Celtic Fiend

            Harry Truman founded the NSA and Joe Biden wrote the core of the patriot act along with Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner. The first bills that eventually led to the act were all penned by democrats. Get your facts correct before you spout.

          • ThomasThePaine

            An unrepented neocon, I see. . . What’s going to take to wake you idiots up?
            There are no republican or democrats in Washington, you imbecile. . . Only millionaires living it up on YOUR dime!!!

        • pat

          As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them… dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

          • ebm120

            copy paste is fun
            You’re contradicting yourself:

            ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

            vs:

            ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

            …and:

            ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

            Vs:

            “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

            SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

            Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

            ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

            OK, listen up, liberal:

            The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

            “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

            (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

            And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

            After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

            Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

            i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
            I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

            And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

            So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

            From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

            The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

            Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

            Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

            “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

            Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

            Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

      • Yolanda Lyons

        That’s funny – I was just thinking “Because ALL of them are Rethuglicans…”

        • Yolanda Lyons

          See how stupid that sounded?

          • Tom Carrington

            Unplug your keyboard.

        • ThomasThePaine

          Six of one. . . Half a dozen of the other. . .

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order right? Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • ebm120

        copy/paste
        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

        Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

        i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
        I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

        And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

        So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

        Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

    • Proud Fireman

      http://www.wmur.com/news/brentwood-911-caller-says-she-would-make-call-again/26019528 – This police officer was invited in…..please look at the link for more “facts” rather than just assume CC’s disgusting (IMHO) rant has any sense of truth in it.

  • ThomasThePaine

    Another Darwin Award Winner. . .

  • Lee

    Congratulations to the police for escalating yet another situation into becoming deadly. Just like the military, police only know how to kill people and break things. The art of keeping the peace is lost.

    • Michelle Hughes

      Don’t compare the military to the fucking pigs. We are NOTHING like them.

      • Uncle Arty

        what do you mean you’re nothing like them, you are all the same, just another bankers b(i)tc(h)

      • Lee

        Hmm, let’s see… police departments recruit veterans, then they equip them with automatic weapons and armored vehicles like the military.. Then they dress them in camouflage BDU’s and insignia like the military. Then they train them in military style urban warfare tactics.. So.. tell me EXACTLY how cops and the military are so different.

      • freedom74

        Yeah, you’re right, the military does all the horrible stuff that police do (x10), but in ANOTHER country. So, yeah, right, completely different.

      • pat

        As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age…hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

        • Makie8df

          What a moron you are. And especially for spamming this entire article with this same paragraph. He said, “That’s about the summary of the available facts reported by the media so far, but allow me to speculate.” Obviously you have no idea what the word “speculate” means. You talk about being charmed and buying into BS, but you explain in full detail how you are nothing more than a moronic sheep; a follower of everything you hear without giving a second thought.
          Do us all a favor and fuck off. You don’t need to be on the internet.

        • ebm120

          c/p
          You’re contradicting yourself:

          ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

          vs:

          ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

          …and:

          ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

          Vs:

          “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

          SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

          Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

          ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

          OK, listen up, liberal:

          The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

          “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

          (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

          And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

          After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

          Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

          i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
          I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

          And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

          So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

          From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

          The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

          Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

          Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

          “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

          Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

          Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

    • Michelle Hughes

      Oh yeah….and FUCK YOU

      • Corpus DeMano

        I wasn’t going to comment anywhere on here but holy sh1t this has to be the funniest thing I’ve seen all day as a response. I guess everyone else won. lmao

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • ebm120

        c-p
        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

        Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

        i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
        I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

        And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

        So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

        Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

    • Proud Fireman

      http://www.wmur.com/news/brentwood-911-caller-says-she-would-make-call-again/26019528 – this police officer did not “escalate” the situation within his control. He was invited and then ambushed.

  • GenJohnStarkReturns

    The days of “Peace Officers” are long gone. And with it, so goes the days of peace.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age…hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • ebm120

        copy|paste

        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

        Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

        i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
        I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

        And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

        So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

        Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

  • illuminarch

    Judging by their comments about the old man and his son, it’s apparent their neighbors barely knew them. And yet it was so, so important that the cops be called because of an argument. And likewise, it’s so, so important that the cops had to show what take-charge he-men they are and storm the house. All that ego and meddling is totally worth two lives lost and two homes destroyed.

    • *OLD PIZZA*

      “Storm” the house? Just where did you get that erroneous sensationalism?

      • illuminarch

        The cop entered uninvited. A man’s home is his castle, and may no more be violated by costumed government thugs than private criminals. It certainly didn’t help the situation now, did it?

        • Sched

          You KNOW that Walter Nolan did not allow the officer into HIS house? You KNOW this? if so, how? Were you there? The answer is that you don’t, you weren’t, and you’re just another loser, hurting the conservative cause with your childish shyte.

          • illuminarch

            Factually, I know as much as you do about this case – very little. My opinion is based on surmise and common sense. People who are intent on shooting police officers do not typically invite them into their home, first. In the worst case, this is no more unfounded than your kneejerk support of the police.

            What I do KNOW is that the arrival of the police turned what was a dispute between family members into a shoot out and an explosion. I also KNOW that the proper role of anyone trying to resolve such a dispute is first to avoid making it worse than it was before.

            Also, I am not a “conservative” (a progressive seeking to defend and consolidate the gains of last generation’s progressives), which, perhaps, is why I am not an apologist for state initiated and instigated violence. So I don’t particularly care whether or not I’m hurting the “conservative cause” — whatever you happen to think that is.

          • Sched

            Factually, you are wrong from the get-go. It wasn’t Mike Nolans home. It was Walter Nolans home. Given your inability to grasp this, and the self indulgent, unbalanced nature of the rest of your comment, I say to you, ‘you go girl’…you’re winning…keep it up, Charlie. You blame the cop, when you should blame the shooter. You’re a cop hater. If you don’t care about the conservative cause, youre a bad American,
            dont care about much of anything important, and, consequently your views
            don’t count for much. But, deep down, I expect you already know that.

          • illuminarch

            It’s interesting that you think that promoting de-escalation of conflicts is “self indulgent and unbalanced.” I suppose that a good American endorses escalation and violence where ever and whenever, especially where it is likely to do the most harm?

          • Sched

            Its telling that your entire position is based upon the assumption that Ofcr Arkell did not try to de-escalate the conflict. This is self serving, mean spirited, and juvenile. Ofcr Arkell asked Walter Nolan if he could enter the dwelling. He was given permission to do so. Mike Nolan then fired on him, almost immediately. You’re not qualified to judge any of this, that’s obvious. You should cease commenting.

          • illuminarch

            What’s obvious is that you are an authority worshipping bootlicker.

            However, I will concede this particular point, in the event that your recounting of events is the truth. So, what is your evidence for this?

          • Sched

            Clearly what you consider to be ‘obvious’ is severely affected by bias, and a fundimental tendancy toward illogic. YOU claimed Ofcr Arkell did nto attempt to de-escalate. Prove that. Others on site claim the contrary. but you know more, because, what, you’re a mind reader? telepathy? Vapors, Tarot cards, rolling the bose…what? What is it, exactly, that justifies your construction of events as you claim, to then validate your rant? I submit that perhaps you’ve bent this event, to justify your rant. Could that be? Could it be that you and a bunch of like minded lunatic frequent his site, for exactly that purpose? Be honest. For once…

          • illuminarch

            So you don’t actually know that Arkell was invited in, and that he did not brandish his weapon or threaten anyone, and all was peaceful until the maniacal junior Nolan opened fire? That’s what I suspected.

            My surmise, as I have already said, is based on the fact that there was no violence and no shooting prior to the arrival of the police. In the absence of the sort of evidence you claim to have but do not want to provide, I submit that it is a pretty good reason for believing the presence of the police escalated a verbal dispute to a lethal shootout and explosion.

          • Sched

            Arkell WAS invited in. He asked Walter Nolan if he could enter the dwelling, and was granted permission. Don’t let the facts confuse you. Your assumption that the arrival of the police makes the police RESPONSIBLE for the escalation in violence is both counter logical, in this situation, and counter to human nature in general. You’re simply biased, in the literal sense. You have an inability to be logical about this, because you have preconceived notions, that you are invested in. This blinds you, OR, you’re just having fun with the whole thing. Its entertainment for you. You also clearly have insufficient experience to interpret what has occurred properly. You’re a clown.

          • illuminarch

            Two posts ago I said I would be willing to concede your point if you provided evidence that what you say happened is indeed what happened. Since you did not do so, but instead went on to attack my interpretation of the event, I must assume that you don’t actually have the evidence you claim, and so I may very well ask you the same question:

            “but you know more, because, what, you’re a mind reader? telepathy? Vapors, Tarot cards, rolling the bose [sic]…what? What is it, exactly, that justifies your construction of events as you claim, to then validate your rant?”

          • Sched

            Its all over the news. The NH AG gave a News conf an hour or so ago, where the facts, chain of events, were provided. Quit now.

          • illuminarch

            So the police and the Attorney General agree that the police did nothing wrong?! Will wonders never cease!

            Of course I meant some objective evidence, rather than second and third hand apologetics. What did Walter Nolan say about it?

          • Sched

            You don’t get to decide whats ‘objective’. Casting doubt on the facts put forward in the news conf is called ‘bias’. W Nolans version of things is no more valid than anyone else on scene. In fact, his families statement is that they are very sorry for the loss of the policemans life, and cannot explain their brothers murderous behavior. W Nolan let Arkell in, and M Nolan fired at him, hitting him multiple times, almost immediately. I wont post more detail, and do your work for you. if you want to actually form a valid opinion, get the facts, yourself. M Nolan owns this. he killed a cop, a father, left 2 teenage girls fatherless, and a woman without a husband. Chanel your righteous indignation at injustice in the proper direction, for once. At the perpetrator. If you have the decency..

          • illuminarch

            I don’t? Does the government get to tell me what is or what isn’t? Are politicians and the police unions the arbiters of truth?

            Three people were on the scene, two of them are now dead. It stands to reason that the sole surviving eyewitness is in a better position to elaborate on the events leading up to the shooting than the Attorney General of New Hampshire.

          • Sched

            No, you don’t. And you’ve been provided, repeatedly, with an account of what happened, from the people who witnessed it (other folks, including neighbors, witnessed the policemans arrival). Nothing ‘stands to reason’, and you’re a blowhard. A cop died. You don’t care. I get it. You are what you are. Clearly what you ain’t, is happy…somehow, that’s comforting…

          • illuminarch

            On the contrary, all you’ve provided me with is a regurgitation of the Attorney General’s talking points, which are questionable for several reasons, not the least of which being that he wasn’t actually there when this occurred.

            I’ve read a half dozen news stories on this and nowhere did I find anything from the elder Nolan nor “other folks” that the cop was invited in, or that he had any other valid reason to enter the premises. I can’t even find any corroboration of your claim that the Attorney General himself made the claim of him being invited in.

          • Sched

            You haven’t read anything. Look harder. The NH AAG who spoke is a female, Jane Young.

            http://www.wmur.com/news/news-conference-regarding-murder-of-officer-stephen-arkell-set-for-1-pm/25951016

          • Sched

            You haven’t read anything. Try harder. The AAG who spoke is female.

          • DEZn00ts_1

            No you fucking moron! TWO PEOPLE DIED!!!!! A cop died?????? Fina fuckingly!!!! But the innocent guy still died as well, over a family arguement. Go be a coward somewhere else. You would get hurt anywhere else but the internet, fucking pussy.

          • Sched

            If you read my posts, you’ll see that I have addressed the murder of the police officer. Thats reprehensible. I’ve not had much to say about the killers death, simply because it was self induce. He got into a violent argument with his 84 year old father, to the point where neighbors were concerned enough to call the police, an officer arrived, asked Walter Nolan if he could enter the house, he was allowed entry, and Mike Nolan immediate shot him to death. Following this, Mike Nolan set his fathers house on fire, destroyed all his property, and killed himself. He wasn’t innocent, and your a jackass. Your inability to accept the facts as they are, makes you, clearly, the fucking moron. And, I am certain that your phoney tough guy mouth has got you in trouble before, and will again.

          • pat

            As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

          • Sched

            Exactly. The site owner, and his pack of man child followers have much more in common with Mike Nolan that any LEO I’ve ever known. They’re a bunch of maladjusted weaklings.

          • pat

            yes chris is like mike Nolan or even Jerry Kane. the fat fuck even looks like jerry. the things chris says are the same things Jerry was preaching about before his demise. they were both slobs, no life other than to push their disturbing thoughts onto others, celebrate deaths of others, against government but refuse to leave a nation they despise because there is no other place for them to go, both cant keep a wife or have others really care for them other than their brainwashed kids and both twist or ignore the facts to meet their diluted beliefs. bigs may be a moniker for cops but chris and jerry both resemble a fat swine. especially a lot more than most cops do. just listen to chris’ rant and when he got excited he could barely breath. sounded like a snorting piggy. fuck you chris and jerry and everything you both stand for!!

          • Sched

            Its a free country, so, these animals are free to spout hate. And we’re free to call these weakling bullies on their maladjusted, violent fantasies.

          • ebm120

            copy & paste

            You’re contradicting yourself:

            ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

            vs:

            ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

            …and:

            ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

            Vs:

            “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

            SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

            Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

            ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

            OK, listen up, liberal:

            The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

            “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

            (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

            And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

            After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

            Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

            i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
            I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

            And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

            So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

            From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

            The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

            Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

            Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

            “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

            Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

            Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

          • Robo

            Perhaps he’d been watching youtube videos of modern police doing their duty and felt he should do his?

          • Robo

            I forgot the police never lie to cover their, or their “brothers” asses…whew…thanks for reminding me.

          • Robo

            Source…

          • DEZn00ts_1

            You’re the fucking clown! You have had no point at all, then say the guy let the officer in his home (which you just lied about to get the upper hand in the conversation, then try and use a lot of big words (like the governmwnt does) to cover up the fact that you are bias in this situation because you fucking are on the cops nuts. You have not oncw said anything about lose of life(shows no remorse) and all you have been doing is beating around the bush at the fact that the cops came and it made the situation worse. Over 3 quarters of the police force in America participate in organized gang activity. It’s not being bias, its being realistic. Police have not been helpful for years, and its common knowledge for regular people who do have tons of money, to know that police are more harm then help. Good day you fucking idiot.

          • Sched

            That’s called bias, and you’re a nut. How does it feel to know that essentially no one in this country agrees with you and your violent, stupid anarchist associates? Arkell was allowed in. Get the facts right. I wont honor the rest of your nonsense with a response.

          • Robo

            “Others”? Like other cops? What a surprise.

          • freedom74

            Ah, greetings officer, nice to see some of our stormtroopers on the comment boards to set all of us US citizens straight. We of course can’t believe our own experience with authority, witnessed experiences, history, etc., your personal opinion is all that matters.

            Well, see you later, when you shoot someone in the movie theater for answering a text, because , ya know, the most important thing anywhere is “THE RULES”, and we should all die to preserve them. That is FREEDOM there, whooo.

            You boot licking dinosaurs are the death of the conservative movement. Keep cashing that pension check paid for by property seizures “with no cost to the taxpayer” while lost in your pre-parkinsons haze muttering about how those darn kids and negros need to get off your lawn.

          • Yolanda Lyons

            Wait a minute – I must have missed something. Where did it say that the father was asked if the officer could enter? The article says that the officer entered the home “presumably without permission”. I guess that means that you are not qualified to judge any of this, either. Oh, and YOU are not commenting – you are bullying and ridiculing people.

          • Sched

            Ya, you must have missed something. The officer asked Walter Nolan if he could enter his home. He was granted permission. THIS commentary ignore facts…and I’m exercising my 1st amendment right to express indignation at the dishonest rant You, and most of the folks here are the scared crowd followers…lol…

          • DEZn00ts_1

            This guy said scared…. It’s obvious you THINK you are smart because you read a lot…. I get it…. But it’s funny, you sound ignorant as fuck! It’s obviously you have lived in a priviledged area where you don’t have to interact with police on a daily/weekly bases. Police USUALLY are agressive and try to tell you to do things that you don’t have to while not under arrest like “shut up” or “get away from the property or i’ll arrest you” while you are on public property. You obviously DON’T flex your rights, you never said anything about lives lost except for the fact that the police officer got what he deserved. You are a burden to society. You want to know why? Because your convo is invalid, what you are saying doesn’t make sense and you compared people who actually notice police brutality to sheeple. FYI most “sheeple” would react like you, saying a cop died boo hoo hoo. Eat a dick coward. I would beat you bloody BECAUSE we need more agressive people to fight the dirty cops and dumbasses like you who protect every unconstitutional action they make, while trying to make yourself seem like you abid by the constitution. You just know a lot of words buddy, nothing else about you is worthy of being called “smart”.

          • Sched

            Keep up the threatening language, you unbalanced woman. Typical internet tough guy. You know nothing about me, who I am, what I’ve been through, or what I’m capable of. Your limits, and tendancies are pretty clear. As is your stupidity. Mouth off some more…

          • TopFlightAnonymous

            No one’s going to read all that, fat ass. Your taking blogging waaayyyy too seriously

          • Yolanda Lyons

            *grabs a bowl of popcorn and waits for the punch line*

          • xXrefuseRESISTXx

            Who told you this is a conservative blog? Conservatives do a well enough job hurting their own cause.

        • pat

          As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for

        • Proud Fireman

          http://www.wmur.com/news/brentwood-911-caller-says-she-would-make-call-again/26019528. This police officer (please he died, show some respect) was invited in

      • Yolanda Lyons

        The officer entered without permission – maybe not “storming”, but definitely without invitation.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • illuminarch

        *golf clap*

    • Proud Fireman

      http://www.wmur.com/news/brentwood-911-caller-says-she-would-make-call-again/26019528 – please read for a better sense of what occurred and not what is represented in CC’s blog

  • GenJohnStarkReturns

    “As a New Hampshire resident, I couldn’t disagree more.”
    Ditto.

  • firstofthefallen

    While I do agree that this situation was probably escalated by the arrival of police officers I have to point out your callousness regarding the cops death. It is unfortunate that he was killed. He has a family also with loved ones that will miss him. I am not disagreeing with your point that cops are assholes. I’m just saying that the pointless loss of life is unnecessary.

    • Linda Marquis

      Wow! Is there bias against cops or what?!? No one knows exactly what happened but the cop gets blamed right away?! How do you know that Nolan didn’t show the gun right away and threatened the cop? I’d love to see how any of you would handle this situation! My brother answered a domestic violence call and while trying to stop a guy who beat his wife ended up in the hospital when the wife jumped him and gave her husband the chance to attack him!!! Then she didn’t press charges! Give this guy the benefit of the doubt tillyou get all the facts! It’s a terrible story any way you look at it but all your hate for the cop can’t hurt him but what about his daughters? Unbèlievable!

      • Michael Smith

        Fuck that! If that was even the slightest concern for that cop he would have waited til back up arrived before he broke into these peoples house. Most of us civilians know that a domestic violence call is one of the most dangerous for a LEO, for the reasons you mentioned, so why didn’t the cop know? Just because someone calls and says they hear yelling “over yonder”, for lack of a better way to put it, doesn’t and shouldn’t give the cops the right to then start breaking into houses “over yonder” trying to find a situation to escalate. There are no good cops because even the ones who do play by the book don’t do anything about the criminals they work with who don’t. Since they turn a blind eye they are equally, if not actually primarily, responsible for the violence and oppression being used against all of us. Every good cop I’ve ever met quit being a cop because they couldn’t stomach the level of corruption being employed by the entire so called justice system. The cop got hurt because he did something stupid, the same as any and every construction worker out there would. You do stupid shit, it’s going to hurt. Just because you have a badge and a gun doesn’t excuse you from the laws of physics and the characteristics of human behavior. If the police departments actually hired people who had even the most elementary college degree this wouldn’t happen because you have to study human behavior, as well as critical thinking, in order to get your degree and so the cop would’ve had at least an elementary understanding of the situation and what to expect as far as possibilities.

        • *OLD PIZZA*

          Backup was there, dimwit.

        • Sched

          Two cops were dispatched. No one broke in. You’re an idiot. You should not be allowed to won firearms. You’re a danger to yourself and others.

          • Robo

            What a great American. People should lose their fundamental rights because their opinion is different than yours. Cmon you’re a cop…right?

          • Sched

            Who’s a sheep now?

      • xXrefuseRESISTXx

        Gee whiz, why on Earth would there be bias against the cops?.?.?

      • Robo

        People watch youtube…enough said.

      • zaiger

        if the cops didn’t show up and escalate things he would still be alive. End of.

    • *OLD PIZZA*

      Cops may be “assholes” in your opinion – until you need one some day. Then you’ll bitch because they didn’t come to your rescue soon enough. Personally, if you ever need one I hope they never show up.

      • illuminarch

        I always hear cops and their apologists respond to criticism this way: “wait till you need one.” And yet I can’t think of a single encounter I’ve ever had with a cop where it didn’t ruin my day. The few times I ever called the police (years ago, when I didn’t know any better) and asked for their assistance, they were profoundly unhelpful and never followed up with their investigation.

        Meanwhile, there are thousands of cases around the country where people have called the cops for help only to then be physically assaulted and imprisoned by the police, or to have their children, husbands, grandmothers, and pets killed by the police.

        So, in point of fact, the police are under no legal obligation to help you, are unlikely to actually do anything to restore you against a criminal act, and are likely to harm you, your loved ones, and your property. So it’s hard to think of any case where I would call the police. One would be much better served relying on themselves for defense of life and property, and if necessary calling on family members, friends, and neighbors to their defense.

      • Yolanda Lyons

        The point needs to be made that there is a difference between “cops” and police officers. I have never had any problems with police officers because they know their jobs and they are there to do those jobs the very best way they can. Cops, on the other hand, are truly cowboys who love their guns and the power they think they have over others. They are disrespectful, mean, rough thugs who like to push people around. They don’t respect others because they don’t get any respect themselves – and that is their own fault. “Cops” are assholes.

      • Robo

        Me too. You’re way more likely to die with a cop on the scene.

    • Jesse Elliott

      You must have missed the part where he said that the cop should have chosen a different career path. Yes, his death was pointless, but completely avoidable. He made his bed and now he is laying in it.

  • Dave Pavano

    This is sad for all parties involved. To me there seems to be a lot of bias against police officers and their duties from this writer. The article points out that nobody really new them, that they seemed to be nice people. When domestic violence breaks out and here we don’t know how severe it was, It seemed reasonable to call the police. Yes the neighbor could have knocked on the door to find out what was going on, but maybe she would have been shot? She could have minded her own business and maybe one of the Nolans would have been shot by the other. But the thing that really bothers me in this situation is where is there any proof the officer did not knock first, and if he heard how bad this fight was, and did try to enter the home possibly after knocking to try to settle the argument down. Police are called to domestic violence situations all the time, it’s their job. I think so far there are too many assumptions being made too early and this writer is trying to turn the situation into gun rights story, when we all know the Obamabots will most likely use this for their gun control agenda… If the facts come out that this officer did go in without announcing himself then we can safely say this was his fault. But let us not jump the gun… There couldn’t have been a no knock warrant or any warrant for that matter since this was an emergency response. That is if I understand the meaning of a no knock warrant would have to come from a judge? After all the writer did say he PRESUMABLY entered the home uninvited…

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing… In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

  • shaw08

    While I agree with you. If you don’t want to catch flack from your own side it would behoove you to say something to the effect that its sad the officer died because of the states influence on his decisions. All loss of life is sad no matter who and why they died. Show a little more humility toward the officer or more then likely you’ll drive anti state people to condemn you for being to radical

  • Michelle Levesque

    What a bunch of ignorant fucks in this article. What gives anyone the right to shoot anyone who comes into their house like that? No one has the right to shoot a cop, even if they came in unwelcomed. You don’t know what was said on the 911 call. I’m embarrassed to see folks from NH respond like this, you liberal assholes.

    • Dave Pavano

      I think the ignorant fuck so far is the writer of this story making assumptions… typical from the news…

      • Michelle Levesque

        I agree. it just shows what direction this country is going in….

    • xXrefuseRESISTXx

      Let me try to put this in terms that even a bimbo can understand. when someone enters your home with a weapon drawn the natural, logical, and correct thing to do is to shoot them dead.

      • *OLD PIZZA*

        Who says the officer had his weapon out? You? And so what of he did? You don’t go shooting police officers ……. unless you’re a bimbo. Understand?

      • Michelle Levesque

        bimbo? try a member of this countries military. On a domestic call case, they have probable cause to enter that home, they can draw their gun if they want for OFFICER SAFETY. Try illegal, stupid, and murderous thing to do. An officer won’t fire on you just because their gun is drawn, you can tell the illegal fisherman who I boarded with my gun drawn that….I never fired on them.

        • illuminarch

          Utter nonsense. Police have killed unarmed, defenseless people thousands of times. It seems I see a new case of it every week, at least.

        • xXrefuseRESISTXx

          It’s “country’s” not “countries” BTW. People have had it up to here with cops and their bullshit. Is being an armed agent of our “countries” military supposed to lend any credibility to your argument? Tell me something are you guys ever going to defend the constitution like you’re hypothetically supposed to, but have never done?

        • Robo

          A domestic call case? Really? People can’t yell at each other without armed men kicking in the door now? What’s wrong with you?

      • Sched

        The officers weapon was drawn then? You know that for a fact? The FACT is, you don’t have the slightest clue. You have NO idea what transpired. You, your ilk, and the author of this inane, hateful article provide the libtards with the basis for their criticisms.

    • illuminarch

      No one has the right to shoot a cop? Even if they barge into your home? Why not?

      • Michelle Levesque

        because if they were called for domestic violence, regardless if that’s what was going on, they have every right to enter. Learn the law, educate yourself, or see what happens when you shoot a cop…choice is yours

        • illuminarch

          Pointing to positive law is no answer. Police are just human beings, no better than anyone else. Badges and costumes and an army of violent thugs backing them up does not bestow upon them any extra rights, it merely allows them to get away with their crimes. If you really believe that the police can do whatever they want because the law provides them immunity (whether de facto or de jure), then you have no argument against, say, the mass extermination of Jews and Slavs in Nazi Germany, or the Soviet show trials, or the pogroms against the “educated” in Cambodia.

          Here are a few recent examples that handily demonstrate why you’re wrong:
          http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/11/25/Cops-On-Duty-Officer-Raped-Young-Woman-On-Squad-Car

          http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=41246

          http://www.ijreview.com/2014/02/115178-police-shoot-kill-80-year-old-man-bed/

          http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/man-killed-by-police-in-raid-on-wrong-house/

          http://lastresistance.com/5541/cops-leave-75-year-old-grandmother-handcuffs-botched-wrong-house-raid/

          https://news.yahoo.com/detroit-officer-trial-death-girl-7-071928497.html

          So here we have two cases of police raping a woman in the backseat of a police car, an 80 year old invalid shot to death in his bed during a no-knock raid, another man and a young child killed in a “wrong house” raid, and an elderly woman beaten and restrain in a “wrong house” raid. These are just a few incidents off the top of my head, there are many, many more. In fact, I can sit here all of today and all of tomorrow filling the page with stories of similar, and worse, atrocities.

          So how does your logic apply here? Were all these people just obliged to be beaten, raped, and even murdered just because the ones doing the attacking were police?

          In any case, your reasoning doesn’t even hold up under the positive law. Police have are not legally entitled to enter a home merely because someone reported a domestic dispute, and people have a common law right of resistance against unlawful arrest.

        • Bill Gradwohl

          “Learn the law” ??

          Do you intend to state that we should all obey each and every law passed by lying and bought off politicians?

          The law is out of control. It is way past where it should have stopped intruding on peoples lives.

          Anyone entering a residence without permission is by definition trespassing and the home owner has a right to counter it in a manner equal to the threat. When an armed cop enters the home without permission, he is an existential threat. A mere citizen entering the home would not have caused the same reaction, I’m sure.

          The threat of force represented by the police is in itself an invitation to escalation, and that is apparently what transpired.

        • Robo

          With the record of cops it is self defense. The second they enter your home you’re in danger.

      • Sched

        You shouldn’t own a firearm.

        • illuminarch

          You should be more worried about the unaccountable and legally immunized police forces of this country using firearms (and tasers, night sticks, and pepper spray) to threaten, maim, and murder people.

          • Sched

            No I shouldn’t. Its not a significant social problem. I’m worried about fools like you feeding liberal propaganda machine with your paranoid foolishness.

          • illuminarch

            It speaks volumes about your “conservative” mentality that you disregard the literally tens of thousands of incidents of police abuse, brutality, illegal searches and seizures, unjustified shootings, reckless high speed chases, no knock raids, dog killings, detainee and prisoner torture, unlawful arrests, assaults and intimidation of journalists and bystanders, fabrication of evidence, perjury, and even rapes and murders as “not a significant social problem”, and that you don’t consider the very existence of violent, militarized, legally immunized law enforcement to be a threat to liberty and rule of law.

            What, specifically, are you trying to conserve, besides authoritarianism and repression?

          • Sched

            You’re starting to sound like the lib now. Prove your contention…that we’re being repressed, I mean. Provide facts. Data. The notion that the citizens of this nation are beign repressed in anythign like the manner you describe simply sheds light on your unbalanced view. You can CLAIM there is a problem ’til you’re blue in the face, becasue it makes you feel good about you, validates your warped, skewed, overly simple ‘understanding’ of this life. But, that don’t make it so. ALL of what you quote has occurred, and will continue to occur, in this world, as long as humans exists. The question si whats the frequency, per capita…how ‘infringed upon’ are we, as compared to others, now, to past history, and, again, how common is this. Not Very. Its just NOT a social problem. And as long as immature, authority hating voices like yours shout loudly, you hurt the good folk because you give the wealth redistributing aparatchiks an enemy to rail against. You may not understand this, but you fuel the fires of the infringement of liberty, that is intrinsic to the growth of government, by being the fool the libs point at as the ‘enemy’, the ‘reason’, the ‘redneck’, the lunatic, that justifies every do-good nannny state law those of that ilk would put in place. It AIN’T the cops thats the problem…its US. Its every vote for higher taxes…larger government…every rail against ‘coproratism, every claim that the ‘wealth is improperly distributed’…enncourages more legislation that IS limiting our freedoms. But, I don’t expect you to understand any of this…

          • illuminarch

            I’ve made several posts now with supporting links which have all been eaten by this site’s moderation software; if you come back later today, you will see them. If you really are ignorant about the huge amount of police misconduct and routine violation of individual rights carried out by government law enforcement agents, you should simply Google it.

            But never mind, I see you don’t actually deny the existence of these crimes. You simply want to ignore it. “Big deal! It’s much worse in North Korea!”

            If that is the “conservative” notion of rule of law and liberty, then is there any wonder it’s been roundly rejected?

            I cannot take seriously a lecture about the meaning of liberty from a man who has just spent the last couple of hours defending the actions of abusive and unaccountable police forces, who believes that things like suspicionless checkpoints, no knock midnight raids, police planting evidence, and extreme violence directed against captive and restrained prisoners are “not real social problems.”

            Do you see any inconsistency in your fears of freedom limiting legislation, but not those who enforce it?

            You fall all over yourself trying to justify or ignore these crimes, yet you couldn’t be more concerned about me peacefully expressing my views, even to the point that you want my God-given right to self defense revoked!

            Despite all your condescension, it is /you/ who does not have even the slightest idea what liberty is.

          • Sched

            You’ve taken the murder of an innocent and honorable man, and used it as a platform to go on a diatribe about imagined abuse. Any balanced, reason conservative would see you as neither, and heartless to boot. I submit that there ARE threats to liberty existent. There always have been, and there always WILL be. The founding fathers knew that, and said so. John Adams said: “Liberty cannot be preserved without general knowledge among the people.” You lack this knowledge,ma nd focus on non-problems. You’re a fruitcake…bereft of any illuminating qualities. Except for, perhaps, the glint emanating from your tin-foil cap.

          • illuminarch

            Is that supposed to be a rebuttal?

            Even if we stipulate that the cop who got killed was truly “innocent and honorable”, that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread or most of your other comments. In this thread in particular, I was making a general point — which you then also attacked, generally. You weren’t concerned about this incident in New Hampshire when you said that my guns should be taken from me, and that cops should have the right to do whatever they want, that’s just what you believe in general, again because you are a bootlicking authority worshipper that is more worried about people speaking than government agents violating an individual’s rights.

          • Sched

            If you want to consider it a rebuttal, you certainly can. Dont mean to confuse you, but, it seems easy to do so. What I made was a ‘judgment’, based upon your behavior. I said you should not own guns because you seem unbalanced. And you do. I am concerned ONLY about this incedent in NH, and see your hijacking of this incedent for your own (odd?) purposes as an indication of your imbalance, lack of good judgment. I live in NH. Do you? I would not feel comfortable around you, if you were carrying. I don’t trust your judgment. You may overreact, take offense where none is intended, see a threat where none exists, and act innapropriately as a result. Those are not the traits of a responsible gun owner. Your lack of empathy for the officer, and willingness to place the responsibilty for this on him speaks volumes. And, yes, that’s a rebuttal too. You may not see it as such. Others may. Have a nice day.

          • illuminarch

            How much do I owe you for your Internet psycho-analysis? Not much, I hope?

            Fortunately my rights are not contingent upon your approval — or the state’s, for that matter.

            I do not feel comfortable living on the same continent as you, and would certainly not be happy to know that you were carrying or anywhere near a voting booth, given your reflexive authoritarianism and lack of empathy for victims of state orchestrated violence, to say nothing of your distorted and irrational perception of what threatens your liberty. And an inability to follow the chain of a conversation, apparently.

          • Robo

            This keyboard warrior is now the arbiter of whether people are imbalanced or not based on internet observations. He should give up law enforcement and get into psychology.

          • Sched

            Pogue.

          • Robo

            Yeah that tin foil cap generated all the videos of police abuse. What a tool.

          • Sheryl Mcallister

            Check out Cop block .com . And ask New York how there tweet us line went.

          • Robo

            Or P I N A C dot com. (Photography is not a crime)

          • pat

            As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

          • Robo

            If you don’t see how this country is slipping into a police state there’s no hope for you.

          • Robo

            Just google, “cops behaving badly” or “cops breaking the law” or checkout http://www.pinac.com or youtube for example after example. One bad apple definitely spoils the bunch when it comes to having power over others.

          • Robo

            If it wasn’t significant the general public would still feel about cops as they did in the Adam 12 days.

          • Sched

            Ya, because the term ‘cop killer’ didn’t come into vogue during the ‘Adam 12’ days. Your view is new and different. Everything you stand for is a new revelation. LOL…you guys invented anarchism, and ‘question authority. ROFL. Keep telling yourself that your self delusional views are reality.

        • Robo

          More idiocy from this guy. You shouldn’t own a firearm because you disagree with him.

          • Sched

            Another paranoid cop hating anarchist. Look, safe, responsible firearm use starts with good judgment. Get some…

          • Robo

            Bet your life I’ve had more training than you.

          • Sched

            Thinkso, roboboy? Bet your life you haven’t. I’ve humped more ruck than you’ve had hot meals, Mary. I probably put more rounds downrange last Saturday, than you have in your entire life. Ever been shot at? Hit? Look, you’re a child. Shut up. You and your friends are part of whats wrong with America. A good man has died, and its a game for you. Fodder for your scared, paranoid dreams of persecution.

          • Robo

            I’ve had a whole lot of hot meals douche bag. You’re a statist boot licker. Nothing more.

          • Sched

            I bet you have. You’re the keyboard warrior, using highfalutin’ political terms (s)he doesnt fully understand. I’d spend more time if I thought I was dealing with an intellectually armed man, as opposed to an unarmed sniveling sheep-follower. And you are just that. A simpleton. Who’s your hero, Levrenti Beria? Look him up…

          • Robo

            You don’t need to bet. You’re mom’s a great cook by the way. Keep condescendingly patting yourself on the back about the “big brain”. Doesn’t change the fact that you’re no better than a cheap nazi that values state power over individual rights.

          • Sched

            You haven’t the slightest idea what I stand for. You dont have the capacity to understand, evidently. I do know what you indicate here, is callous, insensitive, juvenile, and markedly storm trooper like. You’re a bunch of intolerant goons. You’d be joining the Taliban, if you were in the suck. They are doctrinaire revolutionaries too, overthrowing the oppressive status quo. Stay on the sidelines, engaging in your fantasies. Leave others do the job of protecting freedom. A good man died yesterday. Show some respect.

    • Liberal?

      What are you smoking?

    • Robo

      An armed person, likely wearing black, entered the house.

    • Vicky Lynn Haskell

      Seriously what the hell makes you think these ASS HATE are liberals? More likely tea party freaks,r anarchists or llibertarins! Certainly NOT liberals!

      • Robo

        Such respect for opposing viewpoints. Hitler would be proud.

  • Rework Oh Ryan

    “The entire State of New Hampshire is in mourning over the tragic loss of Brentwood Officer Steve Arkell,” Gov. Maggie Hassan said in a statement. “Officer Arkell bravely answered the call of duty and made the ultimate sacrifice, a heroic demonstration of his commitment to the safety of his fellow citizens.

    “Like so many of our first responders do on a daily basis, Officer Arkell courageously put his life on the line to protect others, and in doing so, was tragically taken far too soon,” she said.

    “courageously” must be an euphemism for “thuggishly”

  • *OLD PIZZA*

    There was no “gun fight”; no “fire fight”. It was plain murder by Michael Nolan.

  • Ralph Nalbandian

    Another NRA gun-lover who believed his home was under attack by tyrannical government agents bent on taking away his
    Second Amendment rights. RIP Officer and thanks NRA for helping incite
    this mental midget into yet another instance of gun violence.

    • Robo

      Wow, are you writing from an asylum? The “chain” of reasoning is unreal.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

  • *OLD PIZZA*

    Read some of these posts and you’ll quickly realize that there are a lot of low intelligence people out there who don’t know their ass from their elbow. They’re right there on the bottom rung of the intelligence ladder.

    • Michelle Levesque

      And that the direction this country has been going in for quite sometime……the bottom rung…

    • Yolanda Lyons

      Don’t be so hard on yourself.

  • Richard Onley

    I hope the neighbor’s full information is found and reported–and that those who want to eradicate evil will report every one of the three felonies a day s/he commits until a little reciprocal justice is achieved.

  • Matt

    Those talking negatively about the officer don’t know the facts of the situation. You, like the incompetent author of this article, have opinions based off assumptions. You all speculate and come to conclusions that the officer was acting vigilant and out of his rights. Officers can enter a home with special circumstances and this could have been a case with special circumstances. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet especially an article that asks for donations at the end of it. That seems valid and legit. One corrupt cop doesn’t make them all bad just as one lousy civilian doesn’t make them all bad. Know your rights and know the facts of the situation. Don’t be consumed by pretty picture painted for you to sound good. Nobody is out to get you.

    • illuminarch

      You have missed the point entirely. Even if one believes in your “special circumstances” that supposedly give a man with a government issued badge and costume (and only such a man — no one else!) the right to barge into a person’s house, it in no way refutes the point that the arrival of the police *escalated* a dispute between two family members into a shootout and fire that claimed two lives and destroyed two homes.

      If the police are to be any use at all, they should not merely be blundering into whatever situation they (allegedly) have the right to interfere with, implicitly or explicitly threatening violence. No, they should be attempting to resolve the situation peacefully, and that first requires that they not make the situation worse.

  • jrm03063

    I hope the author of this blog some day needs help from the authorities, but is left without it and is tortured endlessly for hours before they make entry – only to find him dead.

    • Jeremy Reynolds

      i hope you get an anal cavity search and they shoot your dog

  • William Dietz

    I dont like seeing anyone lose their life.The fact is the cop should have stayed out of the home.The call was for a simple argument a simple knock would have resulted in the cop measuring the situation properly.If the home owner does not respond to the knock you dont barge in “THEY DONT WANT YOUR HELP” The problem is everyone wants to be a big hero and in the end the result is this.

  • Unknown Soldier

    Dear 911 Callers,

    The essence of the incident is that calling
    911 is no longer a logical option to attempt
    resolve of a situation.

    The sad truth is that the fact now exists that
    when you call 911 you are bringing into the
    situation a level of mentality that is predisposed
    to engaging aggression and violence.

    The irony here is that the second officer ran
    away as opposed to being the bad ass all cops
    believe they are untill confronted with the stark
    reality of the two way weapons range.

    Unknown Soldier

  • Vicky Lynn Haskell

    Well now what an ignorant little jackass you are…. nice story you have here too bad it is full of information that you apparently made up. As your missing key facts in the case like what Michael Nolan was actually doing. It’s unfortunate he injured anyone else as he should have just shot or blown himself up!

    • lberns

      He was having an argument with his father, you worthless state worshiping copsucking douchebag. Unfortunately it is SOP for the costumed fascist fucks you love to suck off to bust in like fucking Rambo. Ooh Rah!

      • Vicky Lynn Haskell

        Ooh Rah my ass you worthless wanna be! Please eat your gun and save us all the trouble you mentally unstable FREAK! If you choose to abuse your elderly parent I have no problem kicking your ass or if I need to shoot you oh freaking well! Hoorah you dumb fuck! Now grow a pair and stop being such an ass! Protecting a “man” who beats up his 85 yr old father and shoots a cop who responded to the domestic violence call makes you a useless POS! The home belongs to the FATHER not the terrorist with the gun!

        • lberns

          Fuck off, conservawhore. If you feel the need to shoot people, do it yourself, cunt. Don’t ask the state to do your dirty work for you.

          • Vicky Lynn Haskell

            Holy shit you’re too ignorant to even comprehend what I wrote you moron! First you hide behind a “fake name”, you think I am a conservawhore WTF that is and you say “Hoorah” like you think you know WTH that means! Like you would ever be allowed to represent this country you despicable POS! GET A LIFE, seek help or just end your life so those around you don’t have to put up with your miserable attitude!

          • lberns

            OK, then you are a librawhore (same difference in my book). And I get everything you say. I’ve been listening to stupid state worshiping bootlicking dipshits like you for years.

            Newsflash: some people no longer give those fascist costumed mother fuckers you fantasize about sucking off the benefit of the doubt anymore. Enjoy your chains.

          • Vicky Lynn Haskell

            Obviously your time in prison has given you some sort of fascination with sucking off men, cops in particular you moron! It’s perfectly ok that you are gay but your attitude SUCKS!
            It’s truly unfortunate that we have to deal with “people” like you in this world. .. obviously don’t need to be a mind reader to see that it is likely that you will be the next one to randomly kill people without cause! So I guess it’s a good thing I am well armed huh? How about I pay you to eat your gun?

          • lberns

            Nice red herrings. You are the one who advocates state sanctioned violence, not me, cunt. You are the real threat to humanity.

          • Randi Burton

            Big word lame what are you twelve? Just finally figured out what the word cunt means?? You’re stupid son….your mother should have swallowed or aborted idiot…

          • Jeremy Reynolds

            have you read your own replies you bag of twats?

          • Randi Burton

            Mizz Vicky don’t let this moron get you worked up! He’s probably on crank and extremely volatile!!! Thank god everyone’s not as big of douche bag as iberns!!

          • pat

            As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

        • Hottest

          I see you’re a douche to everyone on the internet!! You must be such a joy in real life!! Good thing you have pets because I would bet money that you don’t have one friend who doesn’t talk about how awful you are behind your back.

      • Randi Burton

        You’re an idiot

  • Dave Pavano

    Rescue. “Law enforcement officers may enter a home without a warrant to
    render emergency assistance to an injured occupant or to protect an
    occupant from imminent injury, if they have an objectively reasonable
    basis for believing that a person within the house is in need of
    immediate aid.” (Michigan v. Fisher)

    http://www.policemag.com/channel/patrol/articles/2014/02/constitutional-home-entry.aspx

  • Sheryl Mcallister

    So sad for the officer and his family as well as the other family’s involved. Just such a sad waste of human life all around.

  • Dave Pavano

    Rescue. “Law enforcement officers may enter a home without a warrant to
    render emergency assistance to an injured occupant or to protect an
    occupant from imminent injury, if they have an objectively reasonable
    basis for believing that a person within the house is in need of
    immediate aid.” (Michigan v. Fisher)

    • Robo

      An argument is not an emergency.

      • Randi Burton

        It is if I’m fighting with my hubby!! Lol!

      • Dave Pavano

        yeah, I guess that’s the way it turned out… Just a simple quiet family argument… no cause for alarm… SMH…
        Just blame the cop for doing his job and making a judgment call that turned out so nicely for him when you weren’t there and don’t know the facts yet…
        This writer is only presuming that he entered without knocking and announcing himself. Read the real article, not just this guys opinion!

    • xXrefuseRESISTXx

      I can slam my dick in the door of my truck, that doesn’t mean i should.

  • This house was loaded with explosives. The procedure for police answering a 911 call is to announce their presence and intent.

    The police have the right and the duty to protect public safety.

    There are no facts that the police did anything out of the ordinary in this instance. Absolutely no facts at all.

    • Jeremy Reynolds

      according to the supreme court, it is not the duty of the police to protect you. google joe lozito

  • Robo

    God forbid they knock.

  • Yoyo

    Glad the bad guy died first this time.

  • YourMentor

    the level of stupidity in this threat and in this story is beyond anything I have ever seen.

  • paendragon

    At the very least, cops are paid slanderers.

    All cops only joined up to be paid to pre-judge everyone else “guilty until (never) proven innocent!” – to slander everyone else.

    Thus their initial desire to arrest first, ask questions later, is based more on the civil law onus test (‘balance of probability; which is 50/50; i.e: “If they COULD have done it, assume that they DID do it!”) and not on the criminal one, (‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ which is way beyond 50/50) which is always left up to the courts to decide, usually at great expense to only the accused.

    They’re all scared little big blue gangsters, who only want to hide behind their shields and to be the only ones allowed to have and use guns on everyone else.

    Serve “the public?” Nonsense – they always want to micro-manage everyone else, to only serve themselves.

    Obviously, these people believe the best defense is a good offense.

    TIME TO PUT SOME RESPONSIBILITIES BACK INTO THE EQUATION:

    I feel the accusers (even the cops) should be held responsible for being wrong: if they fail to prove guilt, then THEY should have to pay for the (falsely-accused) defendant’s wasted time/missed opportunity costs, lawyers’ fees, etc!

    i.e: HOW MANY SCURRILOUS CHARGES WOULD THEY DARE MAKE IF THEY’D END UP PAYING FOR THEIR MISTAKES?!

    • n4zhg

      That’s exactly what we would face if one of us made a citizen’s arrest. We don’t get to make mistakes like law enforcement.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • paendragon

        You’re contradicting yourself:

        ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

        vs:

        ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

        …and:

        ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

        Vs:

        “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

        SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

        Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

        ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

        OK, listen up, liberal:

        The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

        “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

        And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, all is forbidden unless and until specifically allowed – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or FOR, you, without getting your express consent, first.

        And this applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribel nation state and empire. So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

        From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

        The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

        Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

        Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

        “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

        Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

  • els123

    THIS ARTICLE IS COMPLETELY FALSE. The policeman had permission to enter the house. The son was violently beating up this 80 yr old father and the officer helped the father from the house and into a ambulance to go to the hospital. When he was returning to the house he was shot in the head by this man, Then the man proceeded to light the house on fire and burn down the connected house. How dare you insult a man who risked his life for the safety of others. If anyone else would have gone into that house and got shot. Before ANY of you even think about saying one bad word about the police or military I invite you to spend one day in their shoes. I know if any of you were in danger you would call the police. I am disgusted by all of these comments. Now two young girls are left with out a father and you have the nerve to say he brought it on himself. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

  • Heehawdonkeys

    The father owned the house and allowed the cop to enter. Are you twisting the story to fit your agenda?

  • Randi Burton

    I gotta say I’m no fan of the police, but this cop was a father a son a friend,etc….I am truly sorry for his family’s lose…there’s no excuse to celebrate a human beings death….unless u know they’re chesters, rapers,or whatever I’m sad to have read this…you Christopher Cantrell are a sad person….

  • Doug Brown

    Have to agree with you. Seems that escalation is all the police want. Guess it helps increase the budget, each year.

  • Dave Pavano

    God, I’m so sick of these ass backword yokels and their dumb hick opinions! Especially this pos that wrote this dumbshit biased opinion without any facts!
    Let’s just get rid of all the police and let everyone do whatever the hell they want! Sounds like a gangsta rap song to me!

    • Jeremy Reynolds

      so what are the facts?

    • Reverend Draco

      That’s a great idea! We’d all be much safer, without the “heroic” donut grazers escalating situations to death.

  • bob

    great article. What this story has me wondering, is whether michael really set the fire? or was he killed out of revenge the same way chris dorner was? messages picked up on police radio scanners prove that police intentionally set the fire that killed dorner, even though they deny it.

    Michael Nolan very well may have done this himself, but suicide by fire? to me it’s hard to believe that anyone would choose to go out that way, that would probably be the most horrible death imaginable. he had a gun, so if he wanted to kill himself why wouldn’t he make it quick and painless by shooting himself instead? seems awfully suspicious, would be nice if the investigation being done by an independent department

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order… Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

  • mj

    Listen you son of a bitch I don’t k ow who the fuck you think you are but how dare you slander the name of an emergency responder who showed up to do his job which is what he is paid to do but died trying to do it. People like you make me sick. If you need people like him or an EMT or a fire fighter I’m sure you’d be the first person inline to be just as nice and kind as can be. I hope someday you know the loss his family has suffered and that someone as heartless and ignorant as you stumbles along to make an ass of them self and make you realize how insignificant you are. Get fucked

    • Jeremy Reynolds

      i hope the cops break into your house and set it on fire then perform an anal cavity search on you and your family and of course shoot your dog

    • Reverend Draco

      People like you are already sick – you don’t need other people to “make you.”

      The tax leeches’ family hasn’t lost enough – they should be required to pay for Michael’s funeral, pay for the home, and support his father for the rest of his natural life.

      • pat

        As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

  • Ben Flewelling

    The author of this article is an idiot. He used pure speculation and lack of knowledge to produce his shitty work. I know a few NH police officers and even more from other states, how the officers are being portrayed is ridiculous and not very well thought out. This is the week our nation honors those Law Enforcement personnel who have died protecting morons like Christopher “Can’t Write Well” Cantwell, and he has the audacity to write this article praising the death of a good man? This author needs to put his pen down and eat a dick.

    To the person who replied bashing our nation’s military, go fight for yourself. We aren’t looking to kill. Obviously you’ve never heard about what great things the US Coast Guard and the National Guard do for people like you. We put our life on the line rescuing people who get into hairy situations, I don’t go out looking for a gun fight, rather I look for the things that put people like you in danger and then mark the problem, isolate it, and work with others to remove it. Think of a big dangerous rock in a river that likes to rip a hole in you boat. You want that rock identified, right?

    • Jeremy Reynolds

      we would rather fight for ourselves just as the man in this article did

      • Ben Flewelling

        Good luck. I just think you too should check all the facts on this incident before succombing to this moron’s “factual” article. If an officer is called to a residence or building for a disturbance call, upon arrival if there isn’t an answer at the door, and violence is heard, a “welcome to our home” isn’t necessary. Officer Arkell was a good man who was doing his sworn duty, protecting people like you from idiots like Michael, this article’s hero, and you still have the gall to praise him. Good luck fighting for and protecting yourself. This “quiet man who lived upstairs and watched TV” was nothing more than a moocher. Just because he was known as quiet doesn’t make him good. Look at the shit who shot up Newtown, he was “quiet” too.

      • pat

        As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

        • Jeremy Reynolds

          you lost me at “Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause”

          • pat

            too big of words for you Jeremy? Or are you just ignorant enough not to listen to someone elses point of view? as I went on I acknowledge it does happen. cops do enter under different circumstances. but when that happens, its against the peoples rights. the 4th amendment to be exact. but I question were you get your information. from chris. is chris your news source? really? because even if you were and continue to be someone that a cop violated your rights. first do something about it. second its an isolated event. that doesn’t stand for all the rest in the nation. meaning for your thick skull. go everywhere else and tell me cops do enter others homes without just cause.it doesn’t happen. and yes you can be against cops. that’s your right but don’t celebrate the death of another human. whether its the son or the cop….

          • Jeremy Reynolds

            you obviously have no clue what you are talking about. cops enter homes without just cause all the time. if youre lucky they wont shoot you or your dog. if someone dedicates their life to being a revenue generating whore for the most corrupt criminal organization on the planet, i will cheer at their demise.
            https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cops+illegally+enter

    • Reverend Draco

      Ss ,where’s the week our nation honors those innocents murdered by the “heroic” donut grazers?
      Oh, that’s right – they’re not clown costumed thugs – they’re insignificant.

      Fucking bootlicker.

  • Dennis

    I want to punch the fucking idiot who wrote this article. Learn some facts you piece of shit, domestic violence calls are the number one cause to officer’s deaths. Piece of shit

    • Reverend Draco

      How about let’s play Hide and go Fuck yourself, bootlicker?

      And stop projecting your piece-of-shitness onto other people – it’s embarrassing.

      The reason why DV calls are the the number one cause (which I doubt, but I’ll play your childish game) of donut grazer’s deaths. . . is that they invade other people’s homes, with guns, and escalate a situation at a time when de-escalation is called for.
      Because they’re fucking morons. Like you.

      • Dennis

        LOL well aren’t you such a tough guy behind the keyboard? Actually, my statement is factual. DVs are the #1 cause of POLICE OFFICER’S (not donut grazers..I bet your fat ass eats more donuts than they do). Don’t you also know, neighbors call the police because of these DVs more than the actual people involved do? Police don’t escalate, they show up with intentions to calm them down but most of the time drugs and/or alcohol is involved and as police are attempting to calm-fully de-escalate the issue, one turns on the officer because they don’t want to see the other one get arrested. They also try to say “I don’t want to press charges, can’t you let them go?” No, another stupid myth. Once you call and they are involved, the STATE presses charges, you cannot change your mind at that point.

        Really feel bad for you, and your ridiculous anti-cop ways. That’s fine, continue being a complete arrogant and ignorant douche and see how far that plays into your favor;)

        • Reverend Draco

          How can I continue being something that I have never been? Here you are, projecting again – an ignorant douche trying to make himself feel better (I will gladly accept the title of “arrogant,” as I’ve earned the right to be arrogant, by virtue of education and hard work).

          I’ve heard that there are treatments for your condition. Please check into it before you embarrass yourself any further.

          Yes, I do know that people suffering from Glady Kravitz Syndrome call the tax leeches over DV more often than anyone else – it’s in their nature to be busybodies who can’t mind their own fucking business. There is no justification for this nonsense – only pissy-ass excuses.

          BTW – the last donut I had was in early April.

          Dipshit.

          • Dennis

            What am I projecting? Your responses are quite vague, and difficult to understand. I think you need to get a refund on your education. Your anger towards police officers blinds your reality POV.

            Not quite sure what my condition is, and I am not the one embarrassing myself.

            It’s not so much Glady Kravitz Syndrome, as you don’t need to be a snoop when you can clearly hear/see violent issues without having to be invasive. Police are called to make sure things don’t get escalate to a physical level…but I guess in your opinion, fuck the police, and let the couple just kill each other instead.

            Loser. Have a great life.

  • Sam Hensel-Hunter

    Just because law law enforcement officers abuse their power(extensively, there are many, many cops who deserve to get shot) does not give anyone the right to dehumanize Steve Arkell. http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/05/13/steve-arkell-slain-new-hampshire-officer-remembered-peacemaker/vp3l7HKT4wyKHax1e1uC0K/story.html Read this article with interviews with members of Steve’s community and gain some perspective.

  • Proud Fireman

    Um, the neighbors of this duplex were not home at the time. Neighbors down the street called this very loud domestic argument into the Police. The part time police officer did request invitation into this house. These statements are noted in WMUR NH local TV station reporting. I’m disgusted by this article and many of the noted comments below.

    • pat

      As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order… Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

      • Proud Fireman

        Pat, I agree with many of your points, I’m about to post a link that has a few more facts that were available to anyone that wanted to read/find them before an anti-police rant. But I do ask that you not make this personal and issue personal attacks. CC might not make the human race proud, but this is his forum. If you show respect, maybe he’ll show some.

  • pat

    As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age… hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

  • pat

    As more information comes out on what actually happened in Brentwood hopefully everyone realizes how much of an idiot chris is with his “speculation”. Shit just flows out of chris’ mouth. Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause. meaning a safety concern for the others causes for a cop to enter uninvited. and if a cop enters under any other circumstance it is done against others rights. there are a select few cops that do this. no all cops invade peoples rights. yes people have rights that the government has determined important to the way of life. but if youre against the government and dont support one then you wouldnt have those rights. so im confused chris. are you against rights or the invasion of them. dont get me wrong I don’t support all governments decisions or the people that make them, but where you have a society you need order. Chris says that the evil cop went in guns blazing. In fact from the original reports the father (in his 80s) was already taken out of the home willingly. as a wannabe journalist I would think you would have known this. or at least gotten all your facts before letting shit flow out of your mouth. if there was no issue the father would have stayed in the house with his son. People that knew the shooter believed he may have been suffering from a mental disorder. the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man. before he even entered he was “ambushed” by the son and killed. the cop never had a chance to defend himself. meaning for you chris his gun was still holstered. like cops, its not illegal to carry a gun. its called the second amendment. but wait again youre an anarchist so you don’t understand government. everyone can opening carry a gun (except felons because they lost their right). You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else. enough for his father to leave him and go with the cop to safety. Bottle line, it was a murder by the son. he then he killed himself. any sane person doesn’t brutally murder someone (cop or no cop) and then take their own life. and for chris and everyone else to celebrate the death of another (even if you do not agree with their career choice) is a disturbed piece of shit. you celebrate the death of a human being! a person that had a family. that is more than being an asshole an antsiest or an anarchist. I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for. but you might have someone I guess. most do. like I bet you have a kid here or two. you probably barely see them too. like some nice girl was charmed by your smooth talking and fed into the bullshit. but just remember that innocent child of yours is just that a child. he or she doesn’t know better yet. but they’ll realize that you don’t have any regard for anyone else except yourself. that’s probably because you are a fat disgusting slob. and youre angry at yourself not the government. yeah no ring on your finger at your age. hmmm I wonder why? you don’t want to live on a world with people like me. why don’t you just leave then. at least leave the us, the place you despise. where would you go though? im sure they wouldn’t want you either. in conclusion fuck you and everything you stand for.

    • ebm120

      so much copy/paste

      You’re contradicting yourself:

      ” Cops don’t just enter a home without just cause.”

      vs:

      ” there are a select few cops that do this.”

      …and:

      ” the other important fact was that the cop went back into the home (after being invited the first time) to talk with the man.”

      Vs:

      “You also blame the neighbor for getting involved. obviously something was not right though. it was not just a regular argument that everyone has gotten into themselves. there was a general concern for someone else.”

      SO WHICH IS IT? DID THE HOMEOWNER INVITE THE COP INSIDE, OR DID SOME OTHER NOSY NEIGHBOR “INVITE” THEM TO TRESPASS, BASED ON SOME SORT OF “GENERAL CONCERN” (WHICH BTW ISN’T A VALID LEGAL REASON TO TRESPASS)?

      Now let’s look a bit closer at your obviously liberal “general concern” meme:

      ” I guess chris you wouldn’t understand how it is to care for someone else or be cared for.”

      OK, listen up, liberal:

      The Golden Rule of Law, upon which our society and entire legal system is based, defines all circumstantial, situational morality (correctly, in the Negative, as Mark Levin calls it ‘negative rights’ manner) as:

      “DO NOT ATTACK FIRST.”

      (Counter-attacking second, in defense of one’s self &/or of innocent others, if and when asked for, is OK, and is in fact a requirement for justice)!

      And also therefore our society and LEGAL SYSTEM is based philosophically on the similar ideal that, between people, ALL IS FORBIDDEN UNLESS AND UNTIL SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED – i.e: I’m not allowed to do anything either TO, or ‘FOR’, you, without getting your express consent, first.

      After all, when one chooses to attack first, one’s own choice defines one as the predatory criminal aggressor, and they as one’s innocent victims; there’s no two ways about it! CAPISCE?

      Naturally, then CRIMINALS (and in this category I include the “cops” gangsters) WANT THE “LAW” TO BE THE EXACT OPPOSITE, that: “All is permitted unless and until specifically forbidden!”

      i.e: which results in all those “What?! So – I’m not allowed to trespass and murder innocent citizens on Tuesdays, from between 4AM and 9 PM?!
      I. Did. Not. Know. That! Well well, how about that; I guess I’d better Update My Procedures now, eh?!” excuses we read about in the newspapers all the time!

      And, I must note, that this REAL Law of the Golden Rule applies equally at all levels of human interaction, too – from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation state and empire.

      So even the largest group (‘the state’) doesn’t have any more might-made-right to attack any of its real live individual human citizen component parts than one individual would have to attack any other individual first – which is why we have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and not – as the liberal criminal gangsters always prefer – the responsibility to be pre-judged as guilty until never proven innocent, as extorted by the idolatrous group-might-makes-right threat scenario they demand we all Submit to.

      From this Golden-Rule of law agreement, we gain trust, progress, and civilization; this “social contract” means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) others first. Period.

      The rest are all symptoms, and all sub-sequent valid legislation depends on that Rule: Every law is an if/then warning which says, in effect: If and when you choose to attack first in this, that, or those ways, then this, that, and these punishments will apply to you.

      Civil and criminal laws are the exact same, too: You pay for what you take, and when you choose to renege on your responsibilities, you lose your rights.

      Bad laws are slanderously “pre-emptive” first attacks, like all gun control laws:

      “Since you DO own a gun, therefore you WILL use it to commit some crimes, SO we must now stop you by ‘defensively’ attacking you first – for your own good, of course, you filthy criminal!” There’s no if/then; they are threats, not valid warnings. Pretty much every “law” any liberal ever passes, is some form of fraudulent, slanderous, criminal extortion like this.

      Other bad laws depend not on what your free-will choice of what you might DO might eventually be, but on their subjective yet objectifying, idolatrous and predeterministic definitions of what you ARE: in islam’s prejudicially slanderous us-versus-them and might makes right sharia code, all weaker groups – foreign infidels, women, children, slaves – are openly and officially pre-discriminated against, encoded right into their system of literally criminal “laws.”

      Now, it seems to me, that you want “the state” (aka the biggest gang), to be allowed to attack everyone else first, unasked, but “for their own good,” of course! Therefore: YOU = FASCIST

  • WITSION

    Fuck this dead mother fucker. He’ll mind his own business and keep his hands to himself from now on. There are those of us who believe the swat assholes set the damn house on fire deliberately.

    • pat

      swat never got close to the house you dumb fuck. media was there before the swat was…it was a standoff after the cop was murdered. but wow. you celebrate the death of another based on their career choice. nice! good look for you.

      • pat

        you and chris sound just like Jerry Kane. I don’t know what you look like but chris the fat fuck even looks like jerry. the things chris says are the same things Jerry was preaching about before his demise. they were both slobs, no life other than to push their disturbing thoughts onto others, celebrate deaths of others, against government but refuse to leave a nation they despise because there is no other place for them to go, both cant keep a wife or have others really care for them other than the brainwashed kids and both twist or ignore the facts to meet their diluted beliefs. bigs may be a moniker for cops but chris and jerry both resemble a big a lot more than most cops do. just listen to chris’ rant and when he got excited he could barely breath. sounded like a snorting piggy. fuck you, chris and jerry and everything you both stand for!!

    • Sched

      And there are those of us who know you’re an idiot.

  • Proud Fireman
  • Guest

    So with all the BS posted on here, I’m supposed to call the Police everytime I hear my neighbors arguing? What if I like my neighbors and don’t want the Police to shoot them and then burn down their house? The only criminal act that happened here was perpetuated by the Police. It cost a gung ho cop his life. Perhaps if he used a little common sense and didn’t violate the 4th amendment he would still be alive. He chose to act in a criminal manner. You cannot bust into someone’s house with a gun because people are getting loud with each other. It happens every minute of every day. In this case the Police acted in a criminal manner- it’s called “the castle doctrine” and even the Police cannot violate it and then try and cover it up by starting a fire. Look it up.

  • Jeff Flotch Mckeown

    Live free or die is BULLSHIT>