The Daily Shoah! Episode 62: Strategic Buckles

I once again had the pleasure of joining the fine upstanding huwhite men of TheRightStuff.biz for an episode of The Daily Shoah. On my previous appearance, I had appeared for a segment as the subject of an interview, but this time I was on their “Death Panel” for the entire show. So it didn’t center around me like previously, but we got to chime in on all manner of interesting subjects.

Their description of the show;

The Daily Shoah w/ TheRightStuff.biz

The Daily Shoah w/ TheRightStuff.biz

Happy Hanukkah! The Death Panel talk Pearl Harbor, San Bernardino, French Elections, and Trump. Featuring a handful of your favorite goyish rock and roll solid gold hits, and The Merchant Minute.

Death Panelists: Seventh Son, Mike Enoch, Ghoul, Alex McNabb, Fash-East, the Autiste and Christopher Cantwell.

  • 0:00 Intro (Hanukkah Song)
  • 5:40 Le Chateau Fash-East
  • 28:30 San Bernardino
  • 50:00 Who is Sam Hyde?
  • 59:24 Autiste Countersignals TRVMP
  • 1:19:45 “Fawkes” by Temple of the ZOG
  • 1:36:40 “Shitlord” by Toilet Law
  • 1:39:50 D’nations
  • 1:52:16 “Chimps in Suits” by Moonman
  • 1:57:30 Le Chateau Le Pen
  • 2:09:30 San Bernardino False Flag
  • 2:33:00 The Merchant Minute

 

 

 

This effort is made possible by donors like you. You can also help by shopping through my Amazon affiliate link. Without that support, this site will cease to exist.

Subscribe via email and never miss another post!

  • I did a couple of searches to determine what “huwhite” means but nothing is clearly evident.

    • Kudzu_Bob

      It is a playful but respectful allusion way that patrician pro-White race realist Jared Taylor of American Renaissance.pronounces “White.”

  • paendragon

    I have absolutely no idea what any of that meant. (‘ZOG’ indicates you *may* be blaming “Da Jooz!”)?

    • Rascal

      Some day Libertarians will realize that in some cases it actually is Joos. Until then you are screwed.

      • paendragon

        I blame banksters because they are the counterfeiters’ union and will foment all conflicts because in backing both sides they always win: the losers will still owe them and the winners, the winners will owe them, and both will pay for reconstruction. However, one doesn’t have to be a Jew to be a bankster; proportionally, not many Jews are banksters, and most banksters are NOT Jewish.

        • Rascal

          Of course all bankers cannot be Jews. They are only 2% of the population. That is a weak counter argument. Someone needs to explain why a demographic that is only 2% of the population represents 3 of the 9 seats on the supreme court as that is a better example than “bankers”. For all you math geniuses out there that is a 33% representation rate from a pool of only 2% of the population.

          • northern_confederate

            Read up on Sotomayor. Depressingly I’d say 4 of them are.

          • Rascal

            How could I forget about that lady. Yea goys, there is nothing wrong with 2% of the population representing 44% of what is essentially the most powerful body in the country. Nothing wrong with that at all. :^)

          • paendragon

            Malcolm Gladwell explained it in his book “Outliers.”

          • Rascal

            I am not familiar with the book, but I would not use the word “outlier” to explain this situation. These are some of the most vetted positions in the country. There is no such thing as a coincidence in this case.

          • paendragon

            Read his books – they’re quite the eye-openers. (Hint: library). Easy reads, too.

          • Rascal

            I may check it out. A topic I enjoy anyways. Based on basic statistic concepts like pigeon hole there is a lot of evidence it isn’t a “coincidence”.

    • Kudzu_Bob

      Thoughtful people typically have real conceptual difficulties when it comes to understanding why AltRightists find the effects of Jews in the aggregate (the word “aggregate” is key) to be a net minus for Western civilization..Certainly this was true in my case when I first encountered the the AltRight movement. Like nearly all Whites in both the Old World and New, I assumed that to be anything less than a philo-Semite amounted to being a genocidal psychopath with a Swastika carved into one’s forehead with a rusty prison shank. Later I came to see things in another light.

      In order to make any sense of the Jewish Question, one must first begin to grasp the key idea of Human Biodiversity, namely, that the different races of Man evolved in quite different environments, resulting in group differences not just in terms of skin color and so on but in terms of cognitive functioning.

      For more on this go to Steve Sailer’s blog at The Unz Review, particularly his older posts. Murray and Herrnstein’s well-known best-seller THE BELL CURVE touches on the matter.. Very useful is Canadian psychology professor JP Rushton’s RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR, the abridged version of can be found online for free. Cochran and Harpending’s THE 10,000 YEAR EXPLOSION: HOW CIVILIZATION ACCELERATED HUMAN EVOLUTION is helpful too, as is New York Times science reporter Nicholas Wade’s A TROUBLESOME INHERITANCE: GENES, RACE, AND HUMAN HISTORY.

      The themes and ideas that these writers deal with are so controversial that they are in effect taboo in polite society, which is why you will not see them discussed by journalists, politicians, or even academics (except for a few of the braver tenured teachers), but they are widely accepted as being legitimate by many geneticists and virtually all psychometricians.

      If you develop a familiarity with these works, your view of the world likely will change dramatically. Then perhaps you will be ready to tackle evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald’s THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE: AN EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF JEWISH INVOLVEMENT IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY INTELLECTUAL AND POLITICAL MOVEMENTS, which also can be found online. But watch out, because that last step is a doozy.

      • Richard Chiu

        I think that, for most of us committed individualists, the fact that someone is a Jew is simply entirely irrelevant compared with whether they are a Marxist or some other stripe of totalitarian collectivist.

        It is true that Jews are traditionally collectivists (like almost every other traditional social group on the planet), and that all of my own ancestors who were once Jews gave it up in favor of individualism centuries ago, well before the intellectual precursors of doctrinaire Marxism had even been well-established. That doesn’t make me inclined to regard Jews as any worse, than…say, Mac users. Actually, I find Mac users a lot worse, just on the merits.

        Yes, a disproportionate number of Jews end up in prominent leadership positions, including collectivist ones. That’s simply because a Jew is nearly five times as likely to have a 135 IQ or higher than the human race at large, and high IQ plays a significant role in fighting your way into the real leadership of anything. That fact does tend to play into their traditional Jewish collectivism, but there are plenty of Jews who are on their way to individualism (including the odd example who decides to remain individualistically a Jew and individualist).

        • Kudzu_Bob

          That’s simply because a Jew is nearly five times as likely to have a 135
          IQ or higher than the human race at large, and high IQ plays a
          significant role in fighting your way into the real leadership of
          anything.

          I used to think that too. You’ve obviously never read THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE.

          • Richard Chiu

            That line of reasoning leads directly to the chicken/egg of “do terrorists hate us for our freedom or because we’re bombing the shit out of their countries” false dilemma.

            I don’t like it when Marxist-aligned intellectuals make noises about how defending national borders is ‘racist’ when whites do it…even if they don’t want anyone else to do it either. But of course they only hyperventilate about whites doing it (whether or not they count Jews as whites, which most Marxists do) because they want white races exterminated.

            I want a nation that doesn’t need to defend their borders because the citizens are allowed to defend themselves and their property regardless of whether it is near some imaginary line or not. There isn’t much point invading a country where nobody will accept your criminal activities simply because the central government didn’t stop you at the border, it’s just a good way to get shot. And I don’t want people shooting criminals to be accused of racism for doing so regardless of where they shot them and what color anyone involved was.

            Eventually, all the remaining criminals will figure out to stay the hell away from people who are ready and able to defend themselves.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Nice job of deflecting the conversation toward crime and the evils of gun control and away from the antipathy that Jews (who by your own admission rise to the top of any system that does not deliberately exclude them) feel toward the goyim. File that one under “lullabies for libertarians.”

          • Richard Chiu

            Jewish antipathy is fine with me. I have my feelings about them, and turnabout is fair play.

            Antipathy isn’t a crime, it’s a fundamental human right. And there are plenty of political systems that deliberately exclude Jews. They just tend not to produce as good a result as political systems that focus on excluding Marxists and other totalitarians.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You’re right, of course. That explains why America was such a miserable hellhole back when its WASP elite excluded Jews and is now doing tons better since Jews have become predominant in in its cultural, financial, educational, and political sectors. It totally makes sense that nothing but good things could possibly come giving a small, highly ethnocentric, high-IQ group with a natural antipathy toward us free reign.

          • Richard Chiu

            I said nothing about giving them free reign. I’m opposed to all Marxists and other totalitarian collectivists, whatever their ancestry.

            Including whites.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You’re against allowing Jews to bring about the extermination of White people in the name of Marx, but you support allowing Jews to bring about the extermination of White people on behalf of liberty.

          • Richard Chiu

            Yes.

            If white people can’t cut it in a free society, then so be it.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Talk about taking a headlong leap into the abyss of logical consequences. White people invented freedom, along with pretty much everything else that’s worth a damn in this world. Enjoy your browned-out planet covered with teeming megaslums from sea to lifeless sea.

          • Richard Chiu

            If you’re so confident that white people can cut it in a free society, then why are you so convinced that Jews will out-compete them to extinction if society is really free?

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Extinct races can’t be free.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            For the same reason that the inhabitants of politically free Santa Mira couldn’t compete with the Body Snatchers. Whites have gone from being a third of the world’s population early in the last century to ten percent and dropping fast fast fast, even as their habitats are being overrun. We were doing just fine until we weren’t, which just happens to track very closely with the rise to power of a race inimical to us, one that looks like us but isn’t like us, one that has an IQ one standard deviation higher than ours, and that co-evolved to have a genetic predisposition to look for any angle to exploit Whites’ natural individualism.

          • Richard Chiu

            In other words, you don’t believe whites can compete on a level playing field. Well, that’s too bad. I know some whites who can, but I can see you’re not one of them.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            We compete by not letting a race genetically programmed to compete with us into our society, just as we stay healthy we washing our hands before we eat, not by figuring we have to “compete” with germs.

          • Richard Chiu

            Fine. But our society of individualists will compete by not tolerating you collectivists who always try to leech off our individual merits.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Did you ever notice how nobody in Jew Alyssa Rosenberg’s Galt’s Gulch had any kids? No, of course you didn’t. You were too busy fondling yourself. Your brand of radically atomistic individualism is a Darwinian non-starter, destined to become as extinct as the Skoptsies or the Shakers.

          • Richard Chiu

            So, were you actually imagining that I would bother to try and parse that as if it were a coherently rational post?

          • Richard Chiu

            See, this is why whites are ashamed of being ‘racist’. They just don’t want to be ‘that guy’. And, when us non-whites meet ‘that guy’, we totally get why otherwise sane whites are neurotically terrified of being anything like him.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            I hate to break it to you, but your avatar is right beside the dictionary definition of “that guy.” You are so totally “that guy” it’s un-fucking-canny.

          • Richard Chiu

            Sure. Because there is anybody who would actually be ashamed to share my opinions.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You admit that your ideology justifies the extermination of an entire race and then attempt to shame people who disagree with your genocidal ideology. You really do have all the self-awareness of a wind-up doll.

          • Richard Chiu

            Actually, I admitted no such thing.

            You asserted that individual freedom and personal responsibility would inevitably result in the extinction of white people. I have never accepted that as true, I simply said that even if it were, then that’s the problem of every individual white person, not the fault of promoting individual freedom and personal responsibility.

            I don’t doubt that you personally would fare poorly under the constraints of individual freedom and personal responsibility, but as far as I’m aware that has nothing to do with you being white and everything to do with you being “that guy”.

            *not with

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You do justify genocide, saying that if it takes place according the precepts of your ideology then so be it.

          • Richard Chiu

            You redefined genocide to mean application of individual justice.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            No, you did that. Just now, in fact.

          • Richard Chiu

            You defined the white race as being incapable of surviving in a situation where they were not exempted from the personal consequences of their individual actions.

            I don’t believe this is true of whites generally, though it seems likely to be true of yourself and those who willingly affiliate with you.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            “You defined the White race as incapable of surviving in a situation where sanitation and vaccines don’t exist and who rely on collectivism instead of their own immune systems.

            “I don’t believe this is true of Whites generally, though it seems likely to true of weaklings like you who interfere with Natural Selection. Now pardon me while I go watch some hentai and fondle muh individual merit.”

          • Richard Chiu

            Okay, I already acknowledged that Jews have issues getting along with non-Jews. I would describe them as “poison”, but that isn’t the point. The point is that I don’t care what happens to any race as long as individuals are left free and personally responsible for themselves. If being white (or black, green, purple, or blue) really puts people at such a vast disadvantage in being responsible for themselves, then I don’t see why anyone would wish whiteness on future generations anyway.

            There is every difference in the world between that and any form of collectivism, racist or not.

            If you’re going to put that in your own words, don’t bother to use quote marks, it’s more than slightly dishonest in implication.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            NOT COOL: The White race acting to protect itself from genocide merely by excluding Jews from its habitat, because that conflicts with your universalist ideology.

            COOL: The White race being genocided through forced co-habitation with the smarter, genetically hostile Jewish race, because that is in accordance with your universalist ideology.

          • Richard Chiu

            I’m uncool with any kind of collectivism.

            I’m also uncool with any kind of forced cohabitation.

            If a bunch of individual whites, being retrograde morons like yourself, decide to band together and try to keep out all the lizard-Joos and other racial threats to your “purity”, then you’re welcome to try it. We will leave you along and just laugh as your pathetic collective dies out because it is made up entirely of people who are dependent on society and thus has none of the kind of people who actually contribute anything.

            But if you want to force a bunch of individualist people into your collective and ‘own’ them as slaves just because they happen to have mostly white ancestry, that’s not cool. You can try your collective with only those stupid enough to voluntarily embrace it.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            “I am okay with the genocide of an entire race, as long as it takes place all fair and legal-like, in accordance with the precepts of muh ideology.”

            Is there anything in that statement that is inconsistent with what you have said? Anything at all?

          • Richard Chiu

            Again, you have to resort to making up quotes to attribute to me.

            Everything I have said precludes this for the very simple reason that genocide, targeting a group of people based on their ancestry, requires collectivism.

            Only in your bizarro-world interpretation can allowing people to be individually free and personally responsible for themselves ever be called genocide. Out of a population of several billion people, with tens of millions being born every year, there will inevitably also be tens of millions dying every year. This isn’t genocide, it is simply the course of nature. No ideological construct at all can change the fact that people die in great numbers. But an ideology that treats people differently based on their race is going to target some people for death because of their race rather than because they individually lack the natural fitness to survive.

            You are casting an accusation of genocide merely because you know perfectly well it more accurately describes your own ideology. But no reasoning person will believe it or want to be associated with you because of it. Which is why any collective that embraces someone as vile as yourself will inevitably fail, because your very presence drives out anyone capable of actually contributing to the survival of the group.

            I’m not doing that, you are.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Quit touching your individual merits long enough to get your story straight, liar.

            What I said upthread: “You’re against allowing Jews to bring about the extermination of White people in the name of Marx, but you support allowing Jews to bring
            about the extermination of White people as long as they do so on behalf of liberty and individualism.That makes you just another fanatic willing to countenance genocide in the name of some higher good.”

            What you replied: “Yes.

            “If white people can’t cut it in a free society, then so be it.”

            You do regard genocide as an acceptable consequence of your ideology. You will NEVER be able to unsay it, no matter what.

          • Richard Chiu

            Then let me clarify. I meant, “Yes, I’m against allowing Jews to bring about the extermination of White people in the name of Marx.

            Yes, I support allowing Jews to bring about the extermination of White people as long as they do so on behalf of liberty and individualism (with the caveat that I don’t believe it possible to exterminate white people on behavle of liberty and individualism).

            Yes, I get that you regard everyone that opposes your ideology for any reason whatsoever as just another fanatic willing to countenance genocide in the name of some higher good.”

            And, of course, “If white people can’t cut it in a free society, then so be it.”

            You are failing to parse the logical implications of projecting a false premise. Yes, you can ‘logically’ derive any conclusion once you accept contradictory premises. The true adherent of logic recognizes that this situation doesn’t mean the insane conclusions are valid, but rather that one of the premises is contradictory to the others.

            In this case, the contradictory premise is your assertion that it is even possible to eliminate white people by holding individuals personally responsible for their own actions. That I should need to explain this rather basic bit of reasoning to you is just another demonstration of why nobody that has anything to contribute to a society will ever want to be part of the same society as you.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            When asked whether you approved of genocide under any circumstances you gave a one word answer consisting of “Yes,” and now you want want to clarify matters, to explain.

          • Richard Chiu

            It’s hilarious that you’re too stupid to understand that your premises were contradictory and that I was pointing that out.

            But I’m not explaining to you. Like I said, it is obvious to me that any collective you form will fail, but I just want to make sure that everyone has an opportunity to see, in your own words, what kind of person you are.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            I’m just some random stranger on the internet you never head of until a few days ago. You can’t possibly care what anybody thinks of me. No, you’re the one tying to explain away what your affirmative answer to the question of whether your ideology, and by extension you, could countenance genocide under any circumstances.

          • Richard Chiu

            So…you think I’m trying to persuade you?

            I guess you noticed this already, but I’m non-white. I also have a pretty hefty dose of Jewish ancestry. So there is basically no possibility that I care what you think of me, given your predilections.

            The fact of the matter is that the more I can get you to say on this subject, the less I have to worry about anyone who deserves better falling into association with you without being warned what a pointless drain on their chances of survival you’ll be. So yeah, keep claiming that individualism is the genocidal ideology. That just helps make things clear in case anyone else is in danger of being taken in by the other nonsense you spout.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            I say: “I’m just some random stranger on the internet you never head of until a few days ago. You can’t possibly care what anybody thinks of me.”

            To which you respond with this non sequitur: “So…you think I’m trying to persuade you?”

            LOL.

            Richard Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

          • Richard Chiu

            So, you assert it is impossible that I care what anybody thinks of you. You then go so far as to say that the implausibility of my caring what you think of me is a non sequitur.

            Why then am I posting? Why do I invite you to continue to demonstrate your intellectual and moral vacuity?

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Why are you posting? Because you are finding that explaining your endorsement of the extermination of an entire race of human beings as an acceptable outcome of your belief system is a lot harder than you thought.

            Richard Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

          • Richard Chiu

            To whom do you imagine I’m explaining it?

            You may have missed that I’m actually predisposed to omnicide. I laugh at your accusation of favoring genocide not only because it is completely impossible to connect with advocacy of individual freedom and personal responsibility but because I wouldn’t blink at wiping out all life.

            For me, the human potential for individual freedom and personal responsibility is the only thing dissuading me from carrying out omnicide. Your apparent delusion that you can injure my feelings or make people distrust me by accusing me of accepting genocide is doubly ludicrous. Individualism doesn’t just stand as a practical bulwark against genocide, it’s the only reasonable alternative to entirely cleansing the world of all life.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            In the 17th century, a Chinese peasant named Zhang Xianzhon (AKA Yellow Tiger) led a peasant rebellion in Sichuan that resulted in the extermination of virtually all its inhabitants before Imperial troops put him down like a mad dog. A generations-long program of resettlement by outsiders was necessary to revive the depopulated province. The only remnant of Yellow Tiger’s reign is a stele that he ordered constructed. This is how it reads:

            Heaven brings forth innumerable things to nurture man.

            Man has nothing good with which to recompense Heaven.

            Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill. Kill.

            Richard Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

            That is, when he’s not favoring the use of omnicide as handy-time saver, just like in the Old Country.

          • Richard Chiu

            Oh, omnicide is no mere short-cut to genocide.

            In any case, the point remains. Individualism isn’t merely incompatible with genocide, it is ultimately the only alternative.

            And my question remains. Why do you imagine I continue this conversation other than to allow you to continue demonstrating your dishonesty and idiocy to any who might otherwise be inclined to affiliate with you?

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Why do I imagine you continue this conversation?

            Because KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL.

            Richard Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

          • Richard Chiu

            Exactly how would that be a reason for me to continue this?

            If I am really so intent on omnicide, why promote the only effective alternative to save human life?

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Richard Chiu cares so much about human life that he accepts racial extermination as an acceptable outcome of his ideas, and if you don’t agree with him you are a stinking collectivist whose life has no more value than that of the other vermin that crawl and creep on this wretched planet.

            Richard “Yellow Tiger” Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

            Richard “Yellow Tiger” Chiu says KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL.

            But hey, it’s all just hypothetical, man, so no harm, no foul. His beliefs are so totally not those of a complete fucking maniac.

          • Richard Chiu

            It’s not hypothetical at all. I fully intend to see every collectivist die as they so richly deserve. I just don’t have any objection to a lingering death as a direct and undeniable result of their own collectivism.

            But that doesn’t answer the question. Why do you imagine I’m getting you to keep making a fool of yourself if I don’t care what anyone thinks of you?

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Because you’re insane.

            Richard “7 Kills” Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

          • Richard Chiu

            That’s remarkably lazy of you.

            It’s also not a reasoned argument. One could almost call it intellectually dishonest. But hopefully I don’t really need to do so. Still, if you come up with something particularly interesting I might continue to invite you to display even more of your unreason lest anyone capable of discerning it be tempted to join your collective.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Richard “KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL” Chiu says “YES” to genocide.

            But in a totally reasonable way, so it’s all cool

          • Richard Chiu

            Meh, that wasn’t particularly interesting but I invite you to keep repeating it. Because it amuses me and I can’t help but feel it’s instructive.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            What’s instructive is your bad example.

            Richard (“Yellow Tiger”) Chiu says YES to genocide and can never disguise his hatred for his fellow man.

          • Richard Chiu

            So, are you just hoping that by repeating a lie often enough, people will accept it as true? Because generally for that to work you have to be a bit more subtle, mix it up a bit. Not that I want you to become a more effective propagandist, I’m just curious and I think you’re probably too stupid to learn anything from my questions.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You’re busted, Dickie (“Say YES to genocide”) Chiu.

          • Richard Chiu

            Well, I should have remembered that my assessment that you were too stupid to learn from my questions was based on the evidence that you’re typically too stupid to answer them either.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Richard Chiu says YES to genocide, then whines I won’t play fair. What the hell kind of an exterminationist are you?

            Oh, the crazy kind. I forgot.

          • Richard Chiu

            Meh, you can repeat that a few more times. It doesn’t mean that you’ve understood anything I’ve said, if you were even trying.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            No, I was too busy laughing at that “individual merits” bit.

          • You obviously have a “thing” again jews regardless of their individual merits and accomplishments, but that is no reason to deliberately misrepresent what Ayn Rand wrote. There is nearly a whole page describing two young boys and their mother in Galt’s Gulch. In my 35th anniversary hardcover it starts at the bottom of page 784.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            I appreciate the correction. That said, “nearly a whole page” is less than a thousandth of Atlas Shrugged. The major characters in Rand’s books seem remarkably resistant to the effects of Baby Rabies. None have children, nor do they seem particularly close to their blood relatives. Objectivism as she portrays it is atomistic, and literally fruitless as well.

            As for who has a “thing” against whom, it is Jews who propose that all White nations and only White nations be turned majority non-White via mass immigration and pro-miscegenation propaganda, even as they themselves build walls around Israel, forcibly sterilize Ethiopian refugees, and clamor for genetic testing of those seeking admittance there to make sure that they are biologically Jewish. Any feelings I harbor toward Jews stem solely from what they have done, and seek to do, to my people. If you avoid walking through Black neighborhoods, then you engage in exactly the sort of thinking that I do, but directed toward a different racial group.

          • First you lie about no children in Galt’s Gulch and now you complain that it was not enough! Write your own book. Atlas Shrugged is not a children’s book and it is not a book about children. For child education Ayn Rand recommended the books by Montessori.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            Which seems likelier to you, that I chose to tell an easily refuted lie about an Ayn Rand novel in a libertarian forum whose participants have likely re-read her books until the pages fell out, or that I simply forgot a very, very, very minor scene in a novel that I haven’t picked up since high school?

            And are there any major characters with children in her novels, or major characters who have good relationships with parents, siblings, etc.? Obviously you are familiar enough with Rand’s corpus to answer my question.

          • I read thru your dialog with Richard Chiu and it seems likelier to me that you would lie and hope to get away with it.

          • Kudzu_Bob

            You mean the part where I quoted him verbatim and he accused me of misrepresenting him, I suppose.

  • Kudzu_Bob

    Christopher Cantwell, you add a great deal of value to The Daily Shoah.

  • Rascal

    The day that Fascist, basic bitch conservative and Libertarian whites all realize they are fighting for their very survival will be a good day.

  • IRONMANAustralia

    That’s the first time I’ve looked at any of their shit and, (despite the audio being a little uneven and not the best listening experience), I got a laugh out of it.

    Reminds me of how in the pursuit of open and honest discussion on message boards over the years, being repeatedly censored and banned by tin-pot faggots, I inevitably found my way to 4chan, (back in its glory days). That kind of environment doesn’t exactly give you the most positive view of humanity, but at least you’re with people who can laugh at it, and anything else, including not taking themselves too seriously.

    You certainly fit right in with that show and it’s probably ironically good for your mental health to be hanging out with those guys.