Recently some right wing activists disrupted a play which depicted the assassination of President Donald Trump. The breech of peace was out of character for reactionaries, who generally tend to prefer order and civility, over the chaos and destruction their leftist rivals have become notorious for. Reaction was mixed, but mostly negative.
Predictably, leftists condemned the act, though not due to it failing to meet their high standards of civil discourse. They do this kind of thing (and far worse) all the time. They oppose it because they see the assassination of Trump as a noble goal quite worthy of artistic promotion. Suggesting the depiction was indecent is ridiculous to them, and they would rather see that disruption take place at something they see as truly evil, like a church that won’t perform gay marriages.
Just as predictably, the right largely attacked their own people over it as well. Not because they condone the violence depicted per se, but because it seems to be beneath the dignity of a conservative to make a nuisance of oneself on someone else’s property, even if that someone else is the enemy. We tend to think the way to pursue political and social change is through discussion and debate. We prefer to win on the merits of our ideas, and view leftist riots and revolutions as downright uncivilized behavior.
The problem the honest conservative then faces however, is that arguments, facts, decency, and righteousness mean nothing to our leftist rivals. If we were going to win on the merits of our ideas, there would be no such thing as a right wing since everyone would be a right winger due to the mere righteousness of our cause. Merit is meaningless to a communist, and so winning on the merits in a showdown with one is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. They will disrupt your play, they will riot in your streets, they will set fire to your buildings, and shovel countless innocent bodies into mass graves, all to avoid facing meritocratic competition. Violence and deception are his only weapons, and he uses them like a conservative uses books.
So what conservative would adopt the tactics of a filthy communist? A conservative who is sick of losing his country to people who have no standards, and realizes that there will be no such thing as righteousness if he does not win the conflict.
So long as we on the right render ourselves defenseless by adhering to rules of civil discourse, in a conflict with people who operate by the rules of warfare and espionage, we will lose 100% of the time. So long as we prefer to punch right and virtue signal, over coordinating to destroy our enemies, then it is our enemies who will coordinate to destroy us.
Sure, leftists protest like savages, and sure, that’s despicable. Sure, leftists lie to gain political power, and sure, this makes them criminals of the worst sort. Sure, leftists riot, murder, and start revolutions, and sure, we prefer peace.
You know what else leftists do? They win. At all costs and without regard for rules or morality or dignity. They get what they want, and they get it at our expense.
So at what point does the right accept that we are compelled in some way to be defined by our enemies? At what point do we realize that peace and meritocratic competition are no longer on our list of options? At what point do we begin physically removing Democrats and communists, to establish and maintain the libertarian social order necessary for our desired meritocracy?
If the answer is not now, then we might as well throw in the towel and forfeit to the communists. We are losing massive ground each moment. Non white immigration and breeding alone are rapidly diminishing what electoral majorities we have remaining. Jewish influence disarms us in the left’s onslaught of identity politics. Our universities teach little more than the propaganda of our enemies to our children, and we are compelled to subsidize it all with our own earnings, under penalty of imprisonment and death for refusal.
Disrupting a play should be the most civil thing we do to these vermin.
During episode 318 of the Radical Agenda, we discussed a piece in Jacobite Magazine titled “Political Violence is a Game the Right Can’t Win“. In it, David Hines explains that despite the American Right’s affinity for firearms, and deep respect for soldiers and lawmen, we are in no shape to fight the communists. The reason, he says, is because we lack the networking and comradery of our leftist counterparts.
That networking and comradery is built up through activism. The unemployed losers we mock in between our productive efforts, are not just screaming into the ether for no reason. They are building teams, figuring out who the leaders are, sizing up strengths and weaknesses, acquiring resources, and honing their propaganda to become efficient mechanisms of radicalization. Put simply, they are preparing for open warfare, while we prepare for structured competitions like debates and marksmanship.
Either that changes, or not only will we lose, but we will be scrubbed from the historical record. Inside of a generation, it will be as though we had never existed, other than as the subject of some false historical narrative like Hitler’s Germany.
Pick one, or the communists will gladly make the decision on your behalf.
I keep the lights on here by selling premium memberships, as well as bumper stickers and shirts. I also solicit donations, and encourage you to shop through my affiliate links. Without that support, this production will cease to exist.
Subscribe via email and never miss another post!