Radical Agenda EP323 – Clenched Fist of Truth

You might find this hard to believe, but the liberals are upset with the NRA. A video advertisement the gun rights lobby group published in April, recently became the subject of leftist hysteria after being reposted to the organization’s Facebook page.

Radical Agenda EP323 - Clenched Fist of Truth

Radical Agenda EP323 – Clenched Fist of Truth

In it, Dana Loesch, an N.R.A. spokeswoman, says that the media, schools, and Hollywood elites are stirring up riots and protests amongst the left. The only answer to this “violence of lies” she says is the “closed fist of truth.”

They use their media to assassinate real news. They use their schools to teach children that their president is another Hitler. They use their movie stars and singers and comedy shows and award shows to repeat their narrative over and over again. And then they use their ex-president to endorse “the resistance.”

All to make them march. Make them protest. Make them scream racism and sexism and xenophobia and homophobia. To smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law-abiding — until the only option left is for the police to do their jobs and stop the madness.

Funny how she never seems to notice who runs the media, schools, and hollywood. What’s even funnier, is that when the video depicts the violence they show white kids smashing up DC on inauguration day, instead of the demographic that burns down pharmacies and pizzerias in support of violent criminals.

Despite this circus of politically correct refusal to address a problem, the left has still gone into full panic mode. DeRay Mckesson, a leader in the Black Lives Matter movement, tweeted that the ad was “an open call to violence to protect white supremacy.” Jon Favreau, a former speechwriter for President Obama, called the video “revolting and frightening.”

So much for that clenched fist of truth. The NRA purposely avoided saying what everyone right of John McCain already knows, and they still got called a bunch of violent white supremacists. It makes one question the value of maintaining this mirage of colorblindness so many white people feel is their obligation as a citizen.

We know exactly who the subversives are, and we know exactly who does the violence on their behalf. We know that we’ll be called racists whether we mention it or not, and yet we remain disarmed in the current discourse because we refuse to state the obvious.

This is our fight. As much as any ethnic power struggle, as much as any economic arrangement, as much as any foreign conflict, we are in a battle with ourselves and our own people over the ability to say what is true and obvious.

Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn once said “Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner does it become strong, firmly established, than it senses the rarefaction of the air around it and it cannot continue to exist without descending into a fog of lies, clothing them in sweet talk. It does not always, not necessarily, openly throttle the throat, more often it demands from its subjects only an oath of allegiance to falsehood, only complicity in falsehood.”

We cannot lie our way to a more peaceful world. We cannot be co conspirators in the spreading of disinformation, without getting blood on our hands from the violence that inevitably follows. Nor can we be passive against lies, which are the precursor to inevitable violence. The only way we stop this, the only way we save our country, and our freedom, is to fight these liars with the same virtue and courage that allowed our people to conquer most of the planet.

We are the Right Wing Death Squads of the Radical Agenda, and we’re the truth’s safest place.

Give us your testimony at 747-234-2254 or RadicalAgenda on Skype.

Join us, this and every Friday, as well as Mondays and Wednesdays from 5-7pm Eastern for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda. The gangster rap of conservative talk.

I’m still banned from streaming to YouTube. Catch the live video stream on UStream. Listen live on the TuneIn app! Got Roku? We’re on there too! Or add the raw stream to your favorite streaming app! Get the podcast on iTunes, Stitcher, Google PlayRoku, RSS, or RadicalAgenda.com.


I keep the lights on here by selling premium memberships, as well as bumper stickers and shirts. I also solicit donations, and encourage you to shop through my affiliate links. Without that support, this show will cease to exist.

Subscribe via email and never miss another post!

  • Stuart Morrow

    The child comes to own himself by homesteading the use of his body.

  • Stuart Morrow

    It was more than a slip of the tongue. You corrected him, then he said “ten billion, but he’s on his way to a trillion”. No. Just no.

    • Hadding Scott

      You are a niggler.

      • EzOvenOperator

        hadding, i have a question. every time i go into a grocery store my wife’s black son steals watermelons from the produce section and sexually assaults at least three white women…so what would hitler do??

        • Hadding Scott

          Have you considered having your wife sterilized? The sexually-assaulting mulatto-boy might have gotten the guillotine. It wasn’t so long ago that some American states had the death-penalty for rape.

      • Moneypennie

        1 billion seconds ago, it was 1959. A trillion seconds ago, it was 29692 BC. If Donald Trump keeps making money at the same rate he did over this lifetime, it would only take him 5,600 years to make a trillion dollars. Yup. On his way.

        • the ultimate gaylord

          Not necessarily. If you have larger amounts of money to play with to begin with, you can generate a larger amount faster. Still though, the point does stand that actual numbers matter and anyone who thinks 1000 times a billion dollars is some small detail is misguided to say the least.

          Speaking of, Vox Day recently posted data that shows that just blacks and mestizos are a net drain of at least 800 billion dollars a year in the US. I’m sure other low IQ populations are net drains, too, but that shows where socialism can lead when the populations are not net payers into the system.

          Only whites (and probably northeast asians) are net payers into the system.

          • Moneypennie

            The supply of welfare creates it’s own demand. The supply of wealth a people create also creates it’s own demand for a massive government full of politicians that want to loot their own people under the guise of helping others. If there is no “safety net” that can be thrown over the poor to hold them down by dependency, then they must rely on the good will of those around them if they are truly in need. If the people around them don’t value their lives enough to help them, and strangers on gofundme don’t see a worthwhile cause, then I don’t want the state using them to steal from me. They musty either be lazy or assholes to not have anyone want to help them.

            However they are very valuable to politicians. Their votes are cheap, or their idiocy is useful. All you have to do is graduate high school, get a job that you stay at for at least a year, and don’t have kids until you’re married. That alone keeps you out of poverty. To give money to people that don’t do this is just finding degeneracy.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            The big problem is that the number of jobs available shrinks by the year and the ones left are becoming more and more doled out by affirmative action racial/identity quotas which exclude whites especially white males perforce. This is a result of current “Free Trade” i.e. outsourcing, offshoring, insourcing via migration to stamp out wage competition and get cheaper labour, all of which a libertarian thinktank shill like Charles Murray thinks is acceptable but which is literal poison to a nation and is killing us.

            In Canada I was literally told at some point that “white males need not apply” for various jobs and when I decided to look into legal recourse for this it turns out such cases had already gone through the courts and the government had used Orwellian reasoning and weasel-terminology in the legislation to declare it fine because “white male is not a protected class.”

            I think your libertarian arguments on charity are, to say the least, misguided. A lot of libertarians these days don’t donate to charities and have a very “fuck you, got mine” kind of attitude. I think the real purpose of any kind of socialism whatsoever is to deal with economic turbulence as a result of trading with others i.e. market manipulations and attacks from outgroups who benefit at other nations/peoples expenses, which is what prompted people like Mosley to come up with ideas like self-contained blocs of countries of racially similar populations who didn’t need to trade outside of this bloc.

            Again though the whole economic argument and discussion has been retarded to the point of us running on clownworld Keynesianism. Fascists from the 1930s were leap years ahead of much of anything you see discussed today, and I don’t think that’s a (((coincidence))) given where much economic “wisdom” today emanates from.

          • Moneypennie

            Self reliance works in any system. Maybe that’s an area where we can agree. No matter what country, no matter what government, people can figure out ways to be successful. Get skilled, know your economic climate, find the need, fill it, thrive. In fascism, in communism, in free markets, the smart and the strong survive. Darwinism is the wolf who’s fangs are forever snapping at your heals, governments can’t save you. Everyone must learn how to save themselves.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            There is no personal solution to this problem, though. Your pretense at rugged individualism is posturing and patting yourself on the back. This has nothing to do with Darwinism and I think you’re really just trying to shoehorn it in. You won’t be any better off surrounded by third world savages even if you amass great riches for yourself. You’re a fool. Look at South Africa. NO ONE will survive this without ingroup preference some sort of sacrifices, and the people who make the most money aren’t necessarily the most fit. I for one am willing to give up the ability to get like, max profits, maaaaan and what that entails for a stable society. This isn’t to say hierarchy is bad or anything or that people worth more shouldn’t earn more, but there are reasonable limits and we’ve clearly gone beyond the boundaries.

            We are a social animal and require organization beyond this rootless hyper-atomized individualistic libertarian autism and towards an end which in many ways would include a government run by those from the stock of the local people that for example would say, disallow access to a local nation’s market for bad actors who want to do things like outsourcing, offshoring and other one-way conveyor belts of resources out of your country which prevent your local community from being able to do something basic like have enough children to maintain numbers on the land to survive.

            I’ll also add that the free market itself is also a largely faith-based belief/construct that assumes no bad actors will manipulate or attack it in some way for personal or ingroup gain which is never the case in reality. It’s much like communism in this way in that its true believers claim that It’s Never Been Tried!™ or that when it fails, It Just Wasn’t Being Tried Right™ and we need to try again.

          • Moneypennie

            I’m trying to find an argument in what you’ve said, but I’m coming up short. I have found a patronizing tone and insults, and I’m not sure why.

            Socialism cannot work if too many of it’s people are dependent on government for purpose or sustenance. Strong individuals make a strong collective. The United States was founded on those principles of “rugged individualism” and became the most powerful economic and militaristic hegemony the world has ever seen.

            What makes the US so different? The 2nd amendment. The idea that the individual can defend himself as an individual, even if it’s in defense against another nation, or even against one’s own government. With more guns in the US than individuals, the US is a very powerful collective that can stand against the onslaught of islamism and the leftist hoards who have toppled Europe and cucked Canada.

            So, with respect, be a Socialist who has wealth he wants to share with others by being more successful, rather than a Socialist who wants stuff from others because reasons and white power.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            The rugged individualism narrative was a product of the circumstances; An open frontier to expand into that no longer exists anywhere on the planet. Your 2nd amendment posturing is cute and all–you have some combat-grade weapons–but you’re not making use of it. You will be an absolute minority soon. If not now, then when?

            I’m not saying excessive socialism is a good thing but of course the libertarians are all-or-nothing types who actually think they would weather the storm of their Ayn Rand/John Galt hyper-atomized individualist LARPing where they say just let everyone who did fine a generation or two ago die because they’re not so doing fine anymore due to specifically engineered government policy changes. That’s another thing about libertarians; outside a few like Cantwell they don’t see those things as forms of aggression against a populace.

            Not so sure the US can stand against much right now. 60% white population, about half of the country wants the whites gone. Muh guns aren’t helping you right now, are they? You’re not doing anything with them. Again–if not now, then when? When you are 40%? 30%? 20%? 10%? South Africa is instructive.

          • Moneypennie

            So what are you doing again? Besides punching right? Go harass a liberal with your non – arguments. I’m raising two kids, working full time, networking with friends, stocking up on guns and ammo and growing food. I’m an ancap, I produce. What do you do besides bitch? I’m supposed to be the female. What are you doing?

          • the ultimate gaylord

            You’re not ancap though since you’re still living under a governmental structure which you wouldn’t survive without, especially when surrounded by marauding savages. You’re an Ayn Rand lolberg LARPer naive of many realities of how the world actually works.

          • Moneypennie

            In other words, you’re not doing anything. You will be physically removed and deported to Venezuela.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            I’m doing about as much as you without the Ayn Rand LARPing and pretense. Not that it matters since the health of most of the nation is still needed if you want to survive. Having some number of small arms (it’s much more restricted here, but still) and having a few children won’t save you when your demography begins to become more like South Africa.

            As Enoch Powell said, the supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In other words the idea is to prevent things from getting that bad and set things back on course for a sustainable nation. You would of course rather LARP and use your weird proxy for identity and group interest in the form of early 2000s internet libertarianism, though.

          • Jews dude. Jews insource these people and outsource work. Jews are meisers, want low wages and squeeze money out of the common man. Jews.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            Well yes it is mainly jews but also you’ve seen some non-jews who’ve benefited from this as well. I remember reading about some pro-migration local politician in the US who ran a virtual slave labor farm with the mexicans and other mestizos as their dirt cheap labor.

            There are perverse incentives that some goys will jump on.

          • True. But I suppose that is because they have bought into the game? Or, they have been brainwashed. That’s the biggest challenge, unlocking all of these white folks minds and showing them how the game is rigged against them.

          • the ultimate gaylord

            A small percentage of the population are literal sociopaths, and some people are just plain greedy and/or myopic. Shitlibs who don’t and haven’t lived in vibrant areas are an example of myopic types. Problems haven’t reached them yet.

          • Hadding Scott

            I read that one of the signs of autism is taking things too literally.

    • Moneypennie

      I’m glad I’m not the only one who caught that. His reply “you are a niggler,” as though he sees the difference between a billion and a trillion as a small detail and that you are petty for criticizing his mistake. As I said, socialists are not aware of the immense difference between these numbers, they don’t see why it matters. That why they can be a socialist.

  • Hayden Donnelly

    You should post your video links on gab easiest way to keep up

  • Erich Salvesen

    Just to let Chris know, I listen to the show over itunes and I am still getting new episodes there.
    Radical Agenda returns no relevant search results.

  • Bip Bap

    NAP conversations are autistic and gay.

  • Walt

    If Hitler’s third book is erroneously known as His ‘Second Book’, what is His second book called and where can I obtain a copy? Or are we counting Mein Kampf as two books, since volume 1 was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926?

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0465be01d1bbb093c30a76b8115789ad1650913f7659c307fa6abe84cace486d.jpg

    • Jon Steele

      Adolf Hitler’s ‘other’ book is of dubious origin, i.e., not written by him–at least according to one very reputable source (i.e., William Finck). I’m not saying not to read it but just keep that in mind when you do. I haven’t read it so I can’t comment one way or another personally. Perhaps Hadding can chime in and clear this up.

      “Or are we counting Mein Kampf as two books, since volume 1 was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926?”

      That would be my guess.

  • JewKnowAlaska

    A “retard” is someone who has downsyndrome. One less chromosome. The caller sounds like his cousin DOES NOT have downsyndrome.

  • JewKnowAlaska

    Youtube: BBC Tyler Kent Affair

  • Jon Steele

    DeRay Mckesson, a leader in the Black Lives Matter movement, tweeted that the ad was “an open call to violence to protect white supremacy.” (((Jon Favreau))), a former speechwriter for President Obama, called the video “revolting and frightening.”

    a) Bring it on you anti-White, nigger piece of sh*t. I’ve tolerated your tribe’s nigger shit for way too long. You have no idea of the pent-up anger and rage inside White men like me. No idea.

    b)
    The entire war on Whites and cultural Marxist destruction of traditional American and Christian values is “revolting and frightening”, you rat bastard, subversive Jew.

    c) F*ck Obama, cultural Marxist, White America-hating coon and disgusting sexual deviant (aka Bathhouse Barry), i.e., “brotha on the da down low.”

    • Its so absurd anyways. What!? The NRA saying all you bums causing riots and destroying property need to knock it off and we will fight your violence with knowledge and truth, and this is an open call to white supremacy!? What reality do these fools live in? Thats why Cantwell says all the cuckservatives need to get a backbone, even when you are tip toeing around these people they still call you a racist. Just being white is racism to them. Guess what then?? Im fucking white! Have fun

  • Gluebrain

    God bless you Angela, your call made me laugh out loud. Yay for the 4%!

  • Gluebrain

    Cantwell’s edited drop of the NRA advert was brilliance.