I was contacted today by Elle Reeve of Vice News, who asked me for commentary on the case of James Alex Fields. Fields stands accused of murdering Heather Heyer, the obese communist rioter whose greatest accomplishment was dying on August 12th, and becoming a martyr for the cause of white genocide.
Unfortunately for the lying Jew scum who are trying to frame Mr. Fields for murder, there is video of the incident. He can be clearly seen approaching the intersection normally, and applying his brakes, before his car is struck by one of the rioters with some sort of club. As the mob wolfpacked his vehicle, he hit the gas in an apparent effort to escape. His path was blocked by other vehicles however, and he collided with the vehicle in front of him. Rather than running away like sane people, the communist rioters swarmed the car again, at which point Fields slams the car into reverse and speeds away, taking several more of his assailants out along the way.
In the immediate aftermath, police acknowledged that the collision was not malicious. Taylor Lorenz of The Hill tweeted this out from his interviews with law enforcement. Then, somehow, the narrative changed and Lorenz deleted the tweets. There is shockingly little coverage of this on the web, but it happened.
If Fields was just hell bent on murdering liberals, there were certainly plenty of them in Charlottesville that day. Why didn’t he do so anywhere else? Why did he wait until one of them hit his car with a club? Why did he slow down as he approached the mob? Why did he speed away instead of going in to finish off the vermin? Why did only one person die?
Why do we not know the names of the people who attacked James Fields? Why are they not being prosecuted for causing the chain of events that led to Heyer’s death?
These are the questions a responsible journalist might ask, but of course, Elle Reeve doesn’t seem particularly interested in seeing them answered. Nor does anyone else in the media.
That should trouble you enough. What should trouble you more is that police do not seem to be asking them either. Given that we know from the Heaphy report that Chief Thomas deleted text messages, backdated documents, communicated using a private email server, and tried to steer the Heaphy investigation, everything that police department does should be under incredible scrutiny. That is why I am so happy to hear that the federal government is investigating the events of August 11th and 12th, and why AntiFa is telling their fellow terrorists to resist the grand jury.
The media race hysteria will do fine for the court of public opinion, but once things start getting laid out methodically in court rooms, I am confident cooler heads will prevail. The single most important fact that everyone seems to be ignoring is that the communists set out to use violence against Unite The Right demonstrators to “shut it down,” and they succeeded. They conspired to violate our right to speak and peaceably assemble, and they made no secret of this.
They did the same thing the month prior at the KKK rally, where they had to be arrested and tear gassed. Police were accused of excessive force and racism over that incident, and the charges against the rioters were ultimately dropped. Shockingly enough, police didn’t want to be accused of brutality and bigotry all over again. So they did nothing to stop the rioters in August, and a riot predictably ensued. If the police had been permitted to do their jobs, Unite the Right would have gone down just as unremarkably as the alt-right rally Pikeville, Kentucky. Instead, leftists took over the government of Charlottesville and rendered the police department impotent. Even this is not good enough for Charlottesville communists, who are literally calling for the police department to be abolished. A fun irony indeed, given that they made such enthusiastic use of police services in the wake of the event.
It rings frighteningly reminiscent of how Hitler described Marxists along his rise to power;
I also came to understand that physical intimidation has its significance for the mass as well as for the individual. Here again the Socialists had calculated accurately on the psychological effect.
Intimidation in workshops and in factories, in assembly halls and at mass demonstrations, will always meet with success as long as it does not have to encounter the same kind of terror in a stronger form.
Then of course the Party will raise a horrified outcry, yelling blue murder and appealing to the authority of the State, which they have just repudiated. In doing this their aim generally is to add to the general confusion, so that they may have a better opportunity of reaching their own goal unobserved. Their idea is to find among the higher government officials some bovine creature who, in the stupid hope that he may win the good graces of these awe-inspiring opponents so that they may remember him in case of future eventualities, will help them now to break all those who may oppose this world pest.
The impression which such successful tactics make on the minds of the broad masses, whether they be adherents or opponents, can be estimated only by one who knows the popular mind, not from books but from practical life. For the successes which are thus obtained are taken by the adherents of Social Democracy as a triumphant symbol of the righteousness of their own cause; on the other hand the beaten opponent very often loses faith in the effectiveness of any further resistance.
The more I understood the methods of physical intimidation that were employed, the more sympathy I had for the multitude that had succumbed to it.
You can hear the full audio of my interview with Elle Reeve below.