Radical Agenda S03E001 – Reintroduction

Here at the Radical Agenda, we’ve been through a lot together. Blood, sweat, and tears, literally. Freedom, incarceration, but usually somewhere in between. There have been times when I thought I couldn’t go on, and for those of you who’ve been around awhile, I’m sure there were times you thought I should give up. I suspect you’ll agree with me that it is a very good thing I did not do so.

For now, I plan to resume regular production of the Radical Agenda on its prior schedule of Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 5-7pm Eastern. You can watch live on Gab.ai or you can listen live at ChristopherCantwell.com/live. I’ve been banned from iTunes and a lot of other platforms, but you can still listen to the podcast here or using the Podcast Addict app for Android.

Radical Agenda S03E001 - Reintroduction
Radical Agenda S03E001 – Reintroduction

For those of you who are joining us for the first time, I should probably fill you in on what exactly it is that we’re doing here. This is an entertainment program. In fact, Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer has called this the most entertaining podcast of the Alt Right. It is largely based on true stories, because I’m a political junky and this is what I fill my head with all day long, but it is not the primary purpose of the show to educate the audience. Rather, I hope in each episode to make listeners want to laugh, cry, and commit murder all within the same two hour segment. I am purposely creating an emotional roller coaster, and my primary demographic is white males.

This is not to say that I am a simple clown or actor, just about every fact stated on the show is true. But for example, when I said Alabama Senate Candidate Roy Moore molested me when I was a teenage girl back in the 70s, this was what we in the business refer to as a joke. Most of the time, you will have a far more difficult time determining where the humor stops and reality begins, and that is done intentionally. I’m fucking with you on purpose, and I expect you to pay me for the service at ChristopherCantwell.com/donate

But let’s be a bit more explicit. I am a racist, and this is a racist podcast, but what does that even mean these days? According to Democrats, cutting taxes is racist, saying “All Lives Matter” is racist, even treating people the same regardless of race, is racist. So I don’t find this word particularly valuable in the common parlance.

I am a race realist, which is to say, I do not suffer from egalitarian delusions about race. It means I believe in science. Human beings are animals not so different from any other. We are biological organisms who inherit features of our existence from the DNA of our parents, and since different groups of human beings evolved for generations in differing climatic conditions sharing different gene pools, it should come as no surprise to anyone that there are differences between racial groups. Those differences depend largely on the requirements for survival in the environment in which we evolved.

For example, Europeans like me evolved in a place where we had to contend with winters. The only way for us to survive before all the wonders of modern technology, was to think ahead, develop agriculture, and refrain from eating our seed crop in times of scarcity. Intelligence and deferral of gratification was necessary for our survival. People who did not develop these traits did not survive to leave progeny, and we are what was left over after the dummies and high time preference savages amongst us died off.

Blacks evolved in Africa, where food drops from trees and scurries past one’s feet. They hunted and gathered, instead of raising crops, because that was what best suited their survival in that environment. Intelligence did not have nearly as large a role to play, and so it should come as no surprise that blacks on average have lower IQs than do whites. Nor should it surprise us that they are more prone to violence.

If all you value is intelligence, then you might be thinking I am saying that whites are the master race, but this would not explain my anti-Semitism. Moreover, malaria resistance proved more important than intelligence in Africa, so in a battle between a 140 IQ and a mosquito bite, the mosquito bite won. Not very masterful, if you ask me.

Jews on average have higher IQs than whites. This is due to their religion, which is to the best of my knowledge the earliest known human eugenics program. You might notice that Jews do a great deal of complaining about racism in Europe and the United States, which is funny to me because they literally made race a religion. They rarely race mix, they select for intelligence, and so when they occasionally do marry a gentile, it is usually with gentile elites, such as the marriage between Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner.

Yet, they seem hell bent on pushing race mixing on everyone else. You see this in movies and advertisements all of the time. It appears in Jewish run media in far greater frequency than in the real world, and I believe this is done purposely to reduce the racial integrity of their greatest resource competitors, like your humble correspondent here. By purposely I should clarify, I do not mean the legal definition of intent. It is rather that the behavior serves a purpose. What I am discussing here is a theory of evolutionary psychology, rather than a planned conspiracy.

Now, since this is an entertainment program, I cannot constantly go into these detailed explanations of things. It makes more sense sometimes to simply say “Niggers steal because they are dumb” or “Gas the kikes, race war now”. These are rhetorical mechanisms to deliver messages, also known as memes.

Another thing you need to understand is how we discuss violence.

I talk about government compulsion as violence, as should be understood by any libertarian. Taxes are not the same thing as payments to your insurance company. What separates the two is coercion. There is a threat of violence if you don’t pay, and society becomes so used to this they don’t even think about it. Maybe you think that’s a good idea, or maybe you think it is terrible, but I’m not going to spend a great deal of time reminding you that when I talk about using force, I’m often talking about the government forcing people to do things.

Simultaneously, I don’t think democratic elections are the best way of determining who gets to call themselves the government. If democratic institutions cannot maintain the sort of ordered liberty characteristic of Western Civilization, then non-democratic ones ought to fill that void. I’m not a big fan of “revolutions” because I think of them as leftist uprisings, but, for example, I would not be offended if the next Democrat who got elected president was forcibly deposed by the military. If Donald Trump decided to dissolve Congress, and call off all future elections, that would be about as constitutional as a carry permit, but in whatever conflict ensued, I would likely support the president. If New Hampshire’s legislature decided to secede from the union, and the United States decided to remind us of Lincoln’s policy on that sort of thing, I’d side with New Hampshire. Ultimately, I think the whole apparatus of the State ought to be privatized and we could deal with all questions of authority by property titles. Until that happens though, I like to remind the audience from time to time that power is not always so clearly defined as most are led to believe.

You’ll hear us say things like “physically remove Democrats” which is a literary reference to Hans Hoppe’s Democracy The God That Failed, and generally the reference is to deportation by a qualified authority, unless the context indicates otherwise. Gas chambers, ovens, wood chippers, and helicopters it should be obvious are fantasy violence memes.

The only private sector violence you’ll hear me seriously advocating on this program is force used in defense of person and justly acquired property. Though I think self defense precedes States, rendering duty to retreat laws and the like illegitimate, my advice is always to know what the law is and obey it to the extent possible. Under the best of circumstances, you can still be prosecuted for defending yourself, and most violent situations are far from ideal. Right now I’m facing 40 years in prison for allegedly pepper spraying two rioters who just attacked the guy next to me and were about to attack me next, and I’ve got the whole damn thing on video. If you hurt someone and are prosecuted, it might not be nearly as clear, there might not be such clear evidence, and you could end up in prison even if everything you did was 100% legal, as is the case with your humble correspondent right now.

I’m not going to explain this crap every time I need to come up with a joke in a fraction of a second to keep this audience entertained. Doing so just makes this job way too difficult, and I already have to go to extraordinary lengths just to keep my website running and the money flowing. I am very much enjoying watching the internal meltdown of the left as they come to terms with the contradictions of their ideology. The same Jew filth who broke down all legal barriers to pornography using the first amendment as their battering ram, are now peddling to the public that they have a civic duty to assault me and perjure themselves in court to prevent me from talking about politics they disagree with.

I would rather spend the rest of my life cagefighting niggers and living off ramen noodles in prison, than back down to that kind of dishonesty and intimidation. You fucked with the wrong bull, and I’m going to shove this microphone right up your collective kike asses until somebody kills me.

424-3-GO-NAZI or Radical Agenda on Skype if you would like to be on the pogrom. Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 5-7pm Eastern time.

 

Chris

Christopher Cantwell is a former political prisoner, and current host of the Radical Agenda. The most entertaining podcast of the Alt Right.