Milo Yiannopoulos, Gavin McInnes, and Laura Loomer held a free speech rally over the weekend in the District of Criminals. It was really edgy. Milo dressed up as a woman and pretended to be Laura Loomer.
No word on what bathrooms he used.
As Milo handed the microphone to the real Laura Loomer, they had a bit of a debate over which of them was the most banned person on the Internet. Each insisting that they were in fact the biggest victim of tech censorship. In the end, Laura Loomer walked away with the title, after announcing that she had been banned from Uber Eats.
I wasn’t at the event mind you. I would have liked to have been, but I was too busy dealing with the fallout from a DDOS attack against my web server, and the shutdown of my mail server by the Deluxe Corporation. I was also short on funds because of donation processing for Outlaw Conservative having been shut down by MasterCard.
Fortunately, I didn’t have to be at the event to see it. It was streamed live on YouTube by multiple people. There are plenty of highlight reels on that platform as well. While you’re on YouTube, you can also stop by Laura’s YouTube channel and join over 85,000 people in subscribing to her. She’s definitely more censored than Milo it turns out, he has over 865,000 subscribers on his YouTube channel.
I can’t subscribe because I’m banned from YouTube. I can’t even log in to watch an age restricted video.
I can see Laura Loomer’s latest YouTube video, though. That’s not age restricted. A week ago she published a video titled “Is Israel An Apartheid State??? Laura Loomer Investigates With Avi Abelow“. You’ll be less than shocked to find that she supports Israel’s ethnocentric policies. The video has over 11,000 views, 21k thumbs up and only 103 thumbs down, at the time of this writing.
Even though she still has a YouTube Channel, Laura faced some financial system censorship too, she informed us in her speech. Her PayPal account got shut down, and she was banned from GoFundMe. Fortunately for her, she is able to run her own crowdfunding site to finance her lawsuit against Twitter. Unlike Outlaw Conservative…
Not all speech was welcome at the Free Speech Rally. A gentleman arrived holding a sign that read “Jews Own USA” and he was promptly surrounded by people in black shirts and MAGA hats who shoved him and tried to block his sign with theirs before chanting “USA USA USA” to make sure nobody heard what he had to say. He was then falsely accused of using the sign as a weapon, just before somebody snatched it from him.
He was then escorted from the event by police, along with Jovi Val, as a black man called him a “racist piece of shit”.
Laura went on to make an impassioned speech about how censoring certain points of view and calling people Nazis is just like the Holocaust.
No such luck… Sadly…
Not to be outdone, Gab, a “free speech” social network which you’ll recall banned your humble correspondant, and all their other top users, turned their 7 figure project into an open source Mastodon node, when all that censorship failed to endear them to the Gods of tech & finance.
The developers of Mastodon, which was originally created specifically to avoid the censorship that inevitably follows centralization, quickly condemned the move, and established a new “Covenant” which requires anyone linked to their flagship node to actively moderate “against racism, sexism, homophobia and transphobia”. On the bright side, they have made things much more accommodating to pornography, and copyright infringement.
As a brief blast from the past, recall that Twitter’s former CEO once said Twitter was the “free speech wing of the free speech party”. More recently, Jack Dorsey clarified that this was “a joke”.
I’m spelling all this out, not to call for free speech, or whine about censorship in principle. Rather, to draw a point. Free speech is a lie, not entirely dissimilar to free markets, and everyone who tells you they believe in it is either an idiot or a liar.
Jews were the loudest advocates of free speech for years, but as we’ve established, Jews are liars. They railed against speech controls and censorship while they poisoned the minds of our people with smut and communism, and as predictably as any sunrise, they completely flipped the script the second they had the power to do so. They told us that pornography wouldn’t result in loose sexual morals in our people, but now they say that immigration enforcement is a slippery slope to gas chambers for kikes. Today we know that the slippery slope is real in both directions.
Today, transgender propaganda is literally mandatory, but religious symbols and monuments to our history are being criminalized. People call for our displacement, they call for the confiscation of our property, they spread vicious lies about us, they call for violence against us, and act on it, and they are celebrated as heroes. We state the truth, we advocate for equal treatment under the law, and we are condemned as monsters and criminals.
When we reassert ourselves, will we permit these liars, thieves, and killers a “level playing field” to reimpose this nightmare world on us?
I certainly hope not.
Speech is about power. Whose words get to control the behaviors of others is the object of the contest. Preventing the words of your opponents from being heard is the surest path to victory, with dead opponents being the most effective method. Anyone believing otherwise will never approach a position of power.
When we manage to overcome this repression which we face today, if we allow transgenderism, communism, feminism, egalitarianism, other forms of Judaism, and other lies and smut to stand on an equal footing with our truth and righteousness, after we’ve had the chance to witness the consequences, then we deserve to lose whatever power we obtain. Not to mention the genocide that will surely follow. I wouldn’t let a tranny speak at my events. I wouldn’t let communists organize on my network. If I controlled the financial system, after seeing what they do with their control, why would I let Jews use money?
The answer to Left wing censorship is not free speech, the answer is to be more effective at suppressing the Left, than they are at suppressing us. And since we suck at lying, there isn’t much point in pretending we have some higher purpose. The impact the alt right had on our politics in the lead up to the 2016 election was not a direct shift of policy or elections, but of changing the conversation. The left was screaming that racism was evil, and we made it fun. The Left tried equate being Right of Elizabeth Warren with being racist, and thus unacceptable. We made being racist cool, and Left of Hitler a contemptible space reserved for queers and cowards.
Now the Jews are fucking terrified, and they should be.
If the Left calls for us to be censored, assaulted, and abused by the legal system, and we advocate for freedom and fairness, we’re playing the same game with speech as cuckservatives play with race. It’s like getting punched in the face, and then telling the guy who hit you that you don’t want to fight him. Being anti-censorship in 2019 is like being anti-racist in 2016. It’s old hat libertarian faggotry. The answer to censorship is not freedom of speech, but censorship of the opponent.
After all, we will outcompete the Reds on ANY level playing field. If we are thought criminals and they are Saints, we lose. If we are both thought criminals, you and I become Saints in short order.
Even serial virtue signaler, Tyler O’Neil of PJMedia has taken up the call to ban Antifa from social media. He is joined by Jim Lakely, interim president of the Heartland Institute, Justin Danhof, general counsel at the National Center for Public Policy Research, Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center , Jenny Beth Martin, president of Tea Party Patriots, Amy Kremer, co-chair of Women for Trump, Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, Brigitte Gabriel, founder and president of ACT for America, and Tom McCabe, CEO of the Freedom Foundation.
But we should go further.
Stripe, Square, PayPal, and others, continue to allow this terrorist group to use their payment systems. We don’t allow ISIS to have American checking accounts, nor should communist terrorism have the luxury of using dollars. Not even to purchase food and toilet paper. Why haven’t these payment processors been prosecuted for financing international terrorism? The chants of “No borders, no walls, no USA at all” seem to indicate an inherently international bent to this politically motivated violent criminal behavior, which makes them an international terrorist group. All the governments of the world should be bringing pressure to bear on them, and every system they use.
And while we are at it, we should learn from our rivals. They did not stop with banning “violent” White Nationalist groups, they banned White Nationalism itself. Then they went on to ban Jews and homosexuals just because they advocated for some of the same issues we advocated for, all the way to the point of attaching warnings to the President’s tweets, and reducing the distribution or shadowbanning of mainstream conservatives.
Joy Reid, Rachel Maddow, Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, and their ilk are far more responsible foe the brain hemorrhage of Andy Ngo, than Tucker Carlson is for the death of Heather Heyer. Roberta Kaplan’s lawsuit against your humble correspondant claims that I am responsible for Heyer’s death even though I was miles away and never met the driver who struck her as he fled armed communists. Why haven’t these communist propagandists been sued on the same grounds?
When former teacher and analyst Eoin Lenihan linked over a dozen nationally recognized (((journalists))) to Antifa violence, why were they not prosecuted? When Twitter banned Lenihan for exposing the links, why were they not charged with witness tampering?
“Conversion therapy” and other efforts to treat the plague of homosexuality have been criminalized or opened such caretakers to civil liability in many areas of the country. We should be aiming for harsher treatment for transgender “health” scams, to fight back against this menace, instead of just taking simple survival precautions like kicking them out of the bathrooms and military.
We don’t have the power to initiate these lawsuits and prosecutions, but while we still have the power to influence the discourse, this is the direction it needs to be taken in. Freedom of speech is a losing strategy for people intent on losing. Censorship is the weapon in play, and we need to put the idea in the minds of our more respectable counterparts to wield that weapon.
When the extreme Left suffers half the consequences as the moderate Right, the discourse will rapidly shift in our favor.
If you want to know where free speech takes us, have a listen to this two spirit genderqueer LatinX who was actually handed a microphone at Antifa’s opposition rally right across from Milo’s Free Speech event.
If that voice sounds familiar, it’s because it sounds an awful lot like this Seattle Pre-School Teacher who said “White People, give us your fucking money” at a Black Lives Matter demonstration in 2017, before going on to say “We need to start killing people” including “your fucking White House, your fucking presidents”.
Should talk like that be permitted? I’d say not.
There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632
Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!
The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!
You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at
This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you.